Abstract

A wide variety of commercial cylindrical lithium-ion batteries are available for use in nanosatellites (CubeSats) that cycle in low Earth orbit (LEO). This space application differs greatly from the conditions used to create the manufacturer datasheets that CubeSat teams rely on to screen cell types and estimate performance lifetimes. To address this, we experimentally test three LIB cell types using a representative LEO CubeSat power profile in three progressively complex test representations of LEO. The first is “standardized” condition (101 kPa-abs, 20 °C), which uses only a power cycler; the second adds a thermal chamber for “low temperature” condition (101 kPa-abs, 10 °C); and the third adds a vacuum chamber for “LEO” condition (0.2 kPa-abs, 10 °C). Results indicate that general “standardized” and “low temperature” conditions do not yield representative results to what would occur in LEO. Coincidentally, the “LEO” condition gives similar capacity degradation results as manufacturer datasheets. This was an unexpected finding, but suggests that CubeSat teams use full experimental thermal-vacuum testing or default to the manufacturer datasheet performance estimates during the lithium-ion cell screening and selection process. The use of a partial representation of the LEO condition is not recommended.

Highlights

  • While conventional manufacturer testing conditions at 101 kPa-abs, 25 ◦ C, 100% ∆SoC per cycle, constant current (CC) C/2 charge and 1C discharge, are used to create datasheets, it is expected that a Lithium-ion battery (LIB) will yield a different performance when it is operated in the CubeSat application

  • Coulombic capacity degradation results are contrasted with expected manufacturer cycle life metrics

  • Test cells in the low Earth orbit (LEO) cycle experience constant power (CP) discharge followed by sinusoidal power charge in unique temperature and vacuum conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While conventional manufacturer testing conditions at 101 kPa-abs, 25 ◦ C, 100% ∆SoC per cycle, constant current (CC) C/2 charge and 1C discharge, are used to create datasheets, it is expected that a LIB will yield a different performance when it is operated in the CubeSat application. This makes it difficult to estimate the potential

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.