Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of 3 different approaches to pyloromyotomy in a large single institution series. Methods Records of consecutive patients undergoing pyloromyotomy for an 8-year period were reviewed. Patients' age, sex, weight, operating time, length of stay, number of emeses, and complications were recorded. Variables were compared between right upper quadrant (RUQ), umbilical (UMB), and laparoscopic (LAP) approaches. Results Six hundred twenty-two patients were included in the study. Operating time was significantly shorter for LAP and RUQ compared to UMB. Length of stay did not differ between the groups. There were fewer episodes of emesis in the LAP group. There was a trend toward a higher rate of complications in UMB group. Conclusion Outcomes after pyloromyotomy are institution dependent and cannot be generalized. Patient safety is the first concern, followed by patient comfort and cosmesis. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy can be as fast and efficient as open, without an increased rate of complications, with excellent cosmetic results, and less analgesic requirement. If skill and experience to replicate good outcomes of laparoscopy are not available, open pyloromyotomy is a safer technique. The UMB approach is an alternative method to achieve good cosmesis without laparoscopy in the hands of a surgeon proficient in this method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.