Abstract
Time-series of imagery acquired by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) has previously been used to estimate woody and herbaceous vegetation cover in savannas. However, this is challenging due to the mixture of woody and herbaceous plant functional types with specific contributions to the phenological signal and variations in soil background reflectance signatures observed from satellite. These factors cause variations in the accuracy and precision of woody cover estimates from different modelling approaches and datasets. Here, woody cover is estimated over Kruger National Park (KNP) from the MODIS 16-day composite time-series data using dry season NDVI/SAVI images and applying NDVIsoil determination methods. The woody cover estimates when NDVIsoil was ignored had R² = 0.40, p < 0.01, slope = 1.01, RMSE (root mean square error) = 15.26% and R² = 0.32, p < 0.03, slope = 0.79, RMSE = 16.39% for NDVIpixel and SAVIpixel, respectively, when compared to field plot data of plant functional type fractional cover. The woody cover estimated from the soil determination methods had a slope closer to 1 for both NDVI and SAVI but also a slightly higher RMSE. For a soil-invariant method, RMSE = 19.04% and RMSE = 17.34% were observed for NDVI and SAVI respectively, while for a soil-variant method, RMSE = 18.28% and RMSE = 19.17% were found for NDVI and SAVI. The woody cover estimated from all models had a high correlation and significant relationship with LiDAR/SAR based estimates and a woody cover map produced by Bucini. Woody cover maps are required for vegetation succession monitoring, grazing impact assessment, climate change mitigation and adaptation research and dynamic vegetation model validation.
Highlights
Several vegetation indices such as Leaf Area Index (LAI), normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and others, as well as biophysical parameters such as canopy height and aboveground biomass (AGB) have previously been used for mapping woody plant abundance [1,2,3]
The logarithmic model is slightly less accurate for both vegetation indices (NDVIpixel: R2 = 0.40, p < 0.01, slope = 0.79, root mean squared error (RMSE) = 15.44%; SAVIpixel: R2 = 0.32, p < 0.03, slope = 0.82, RMSE = 16.51%). These results suggest that both NDVIpixel and SAVIpixel are sensitive to percent woody cover
While our results demonstrated the potential of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data to estimate percent woody cover from vegetation indices, woody cover estimated in this study has some limitations and remaining uncertainties that must be considered: (1) Phenology Phenology of plant functional types (PFTs) in savannas is usually influenced by many environmental factors
Summary
Several vegetation indices such as Leaf Area Index (LAI), normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and others, as well as biophysical parameters such as canopy height and aboveground biomass (AGB) have previously been used for mapping woody plant abundance [1,2,3] This is because woody fractional cover is needed as an input to many ecological models for the assessment of fire, deforestation, degradation, urban expansion and hydrological dynamics [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Estimates of land cover types using remote sensing data have an associated error and uncertainty of unknown magnitude, the estimate of woody fractional cover is very challenging, in savannas This is because savanna vegetation is not discrete but rather a continuum of a varying mixture of tree and grass plant functional types (PFTs), which can show clumping or patchiness at certain scales
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.