Abstract
To analyze the impact of the color of a resin composite cement (RCC) on the optical properties of different computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics. Specimens (N=220, thickness: 0.9 ± 0.03 mm) were fabricated from: leucite (Initial LRF Block/IPS Empress CAD), lithium disilicate (Amber Mill/IPS e.max CAD), lithium metasilicate (Celtra Duo), and lithium alumina silicate ceramic (n!ce) in translucency levels HT and LT. All specimens were bonded with an RCC (Light+/Warm+). Color was analyzed (spectrophotometer) initially as well as after bonding of RCC with CAD/CAM ceramics using CIELab and CIEDE2000. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA and t test served for analyzing (α=0.05). Highest impact on ΔE presented the choice of ceramic (ηp2 =0.155/p < 0.001), followed by translucency level (HT/LT; ηp2 =0.050/p=0.001) as well as interaction between ceramic and translucency level (ηp2 =0.175/p < 0.001). ΔE00 was mainly influenced by the choice of ceramic (ηp2 =0.490/p < 0.001), the shade of resin composite (ηp2 =0.031/p=0.012) as well as the interaction between ceramic and resin composite (ηp2 =0.258/p < 0.001). RCC shades presented differential impacts on color change of CAD/CAM ceramics. Knowledge of the impact of available RCC shades on different CAD/CAM ceramics is crucial for an esthetic outcome and proper selection of ceramic restorations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.