Abstract

AbstractThe 2010 AISC specification establishes the direct analysis method (DM) as the standard stability analysis and design procedure. Although the DM has important benefits over conventional stability design methods, the interface between the DM, the AISC seismic provisions, and the seismic design requirements in ASCE-7 is not fully established. Because the DM, which was developed for design scenarios that do not contain seismic loading, includes the effects of initial geometric imperfections and inelastic behavior owing to residual stresses, it is critical to explore the impact of these parameters on the seismic behavior of typical steel buildings. To examine these issues, a series of steel special moment-resisting frame models were subjected to monotonic pushover, cyclic pushover, and response history analyses. The observed behavior was used to draw comparisons between systems with and without residual stresses and initial imperfections. Cyclic strength degradation at beam-to-column connections was a...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call