Impact of recovery correction or subjecting calibrators to sample preparation on measurement uncertainty: PAH determinations in waters

Abstract

The decision on the fitness of a measurement for its intended use and the interpretation of an analytical result requires the assessment of the measurement uncertainty. Frequently, the determination of analytes in complex matrices involves demanding sample preparations in which analyte losses are observed. These losses should be considered when reporting the results, which can be corrected for low recovery by taking the mean recovery observed in the analysis of reference items (e.g. spiked samples) or, alternatively, by subjecting calibrators to the same pre-treatment performed on the samples. In these cases, neat (NC) or adjusted (AC) calibrators are used, respectively. The way analyte losses are handled impacts on the measurement uncertainty. The top-down evaluation of the measurement uncertainty involves combining precision, trueness and additional uncertainty components. The trueness component is quantified by pooling various analyte recovery determinations. This work assesses and compares the uncertainty of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) measurements in water based on HPLC-FD calibrations with NC or AC. The trueness component is estimated by pooling mean recoveries observed from the analysis of different spiked samples to which mean recovery uncertainty and degrees of freedom are used to estimate a weighted mean recovery and respective uncertainty. The performance of measurements based on NC and AC are associated with equivalent uncertainty except when large analyte losses are observed, namely in the determination of Naphtalene. In this case, the processing of AC reduces the expanded relative uncertainty from 9.9% to 3.5%. The evaluated expanded uncertainty ranged from 3.5% to 12% of the measured value.