Abstract
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to compare the impact of two storybooks – one with realistic and one with non-realistic characters – on children’s comprehension performance. Children’s performances in character and event recall, reasoning and problem-solving were compared. The participants were 100 young children enrolled in 1 of 13 classes at 4 public kindergartens in the Erzurum province of Turkey. From each class participants were randomly assigned to realistic and non-realistic story groups. Each participant was tested individually. After storybooks were read, children were asked to respond to questions on character-subject, event recall, reasoning and problem-solving for pre-, post- and (one week later) follow-up tests. Findings revealed that realistic and non-realistic groups’ comprehension performance did not significantly differ for post-test. From post- to follow-up test, the non-realistic group’s mean scores significantly decreased while the realistic group’s mean did not decrease significantly. The investigators concluded that the availability of realistic storybooks in early childhood should increase.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.