Impact of QRS Morphology and Duration on Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Abstract

Background— The impact of QRS morphology and duration on the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been usually assessed separately. The interaction between these 2 simple ECG parameters and their effect on CRT has not been systematically assessed in a large-scale clinical trial. Methods and Results— The Resynchronization–Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial showed that implantable cardioverter defibrillator-CRT was associated with a significant reduction in the primary end point of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. For this substudy, we excluded patients in atrial fibrillation and those with a previous pacemaker. All baseline ECGs were reviewed by a panel of 3 experienced electrocardiographers. A total of 1483 patients were included in this study. Of these, 1175 had left bundle-branch block (LBBB) and 308 had non-LBBB. In patients with LBBB receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillator-CRT, there was a reduction in the primary outcome and in each individual component of the primary outcome. Furthermore, there was continuous relationship between QRS duration and extent of benefit. In patients with non-LBBB and QRS ≥160 ms, the hazard ratio for the primary outcome was 0.52 (0.29–0.96; P =0.033); in patients with QRS <160 ms, the hazard ratio was 1.38 (0.88–2.14; P =0.155). Conclusions— In patients with LBBB, there was a continuous relationship between broader QRS and greater benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator-CRT. However, our data do not support the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator-CRT in patients with non-LBBB, especially when the QRS duration is <160 ms. There may be some delayed benefit when the QRS is ≥160 ms, but this needs further investigation. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00251251.