Impact of procedural and patient-related risks on 1-year outcomes for patients with 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent implantation

Abstract

Abstract Background While early de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short DAPT are becoming standard treatments for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the impact of procedural and patient-related risks on clinical outcomes of PCI for patients receiving the above DAPT regimen has never been established. Purpose To evaluate the impact of procedural and patient-related risk factors on 1-year cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in patients with 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) implantation. Methods Using data from the multi-centre regional-wide REIWA registry, we assessed clinical outcomes according to each risk factor and compared between patients with and without either procedural or patient-related risk factors. The primary end point was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) and bleeding outcomes (TIMI major or minor bleeding), which was same with that for STOPDAPT-2 trial. Procedural risk was defined as a factor of complex PCI which was previously published and included the follows: treatment of three vessels, three or more lesions, three or more stents, bifurcation with two stents, long stenting (total stent length >60 mm) and target of chronic total occlusion. Additionally, patient-related risk factors were defined as chronic kidney disease, anaemia, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure and advanced age (≧75 years). Results Among 1,202 patients treated BP-DES with 1-month DAPT, 276 patients (23.0%) had at least one procedural factors and 510 patients (42.4%) had one or more patient-related risks. Compared with each risk factor, patients with patient-related risk factor were more likely to have higher NACE rates, whereas low NACE rates were observed in patients with each procedural risk factor (Figure 1). In addition, during 1-year follow-up, patients with patient-related risk factors had a significantly higher incidence of NACE compared with patients without such risks (4.90 % vs. 1.73 %, p = 0.002) (Figure 2). However, no significant differences in NACE rates was observed between patients with and without procedural risk factors (2.54% vs. 3.24%, p = 0.555). Conclusion In patients undergoing BP-DES implantation and 1 month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, patient-related risk factors had an impact on 1-year clinical outcomes, while procedural risk factors no longer had small impact on those outcomes.