Abstract

Fluoride concentrations in drinking water in excess of 1.5 mg L-1 are unsafe for human consumption. To reduce excess fluoride intake, developing countries must use low-cost, point-of-use defluoridation techniques. Although previous work has extensively assessed defluoridation using bone char (BC), most of the advanced studies have been based on the use of fluoridated distilled water as a feed solution. In the present study, BC columns were challenged with a range of model solutions, mimicking various pretreatment options. As a result, the relative impact of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and suspended solids (SS) on the performance of BC filters was assessed. In addition, the performance of a gravity-driven, hollow fibre ultrafiltration (UF) module was examined with regards to the potential for use as a pretreatment option. SS were observed to severely clog the columns and cause the complete cessation of flow. The subsequent removal of SS by UF improved the general filter performance as well as increasing the BC lifetime by 50 %. The UF module achieved a reduction in DOC of 34 ± 6 %, resulting in an additional 30 % increase in the lifetime of the BC column.

Highlights

  • Excessive fluoride intake is highly toxic to humans (Loganathan et al, 2013) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) has defined a fluoride concentration of 1.5 mgL-1 as the maximum concentration in drinking water for human consumption (WHO, 2004)

  • This study demonstrated the importance of considering pretreatment as a means of improving the lifetime of bone char (BC) columns

  • It was shown that SS significantly retard the performance of BC columns and that the removal of SS resulted in an increase in column lifetime of 50 %

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Excessive fluoride intake is highly toxic to humans (Loganathan et al, 2013) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) has defined a fluoride concentration of 1.5 mgL-1 as the maximum concentration in drinking water for human consumption (WHO, 2004). This value is approximate only and adjustment factors exist depending on the climate and consequent water intake of a given country (Maheshwari, 2006). Defluoridation techniques can be categorised into three groups: co-precipitation, adsorption, and contact precipitation processes (Dahi et al, 2000). Several authors have already conducted extensive reviews of defluoridation technology in developing countries (Bhatnagar et al, 2011; Loganathan et al, 2013; Ayoob et al, 2008) and only a brief overview will be provided here

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call