Abstract

The excess risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events is roughly twice as high in women than in men with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To evaluate the impact of preeclampsia and parity on sex-based discrepancies in preclinical atherosclerosis and on the diagnostic performance of a cardiovascular risk scale. Cross-sectional study. Single tertiary hospital. 728 T1D (48.5% women) without cardiovascular disease and age ≥40 years, nephropathy, and/or ≥10 years of diabetes duration with another risk factor. Standardized carotid ultrasonography. Carotid plaque determined by ultrasonography and cardiovascular risk estimated according to the Steno T1 Risk Engine (Steno-Risk). Nulliparous women and parous women without previous preeclampsia had a lower risk for carotid plaque than men (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [0.28-0.82]; adjusted OR: 0.51 [0.33-0.79], respectively), without differences in the preeclampsia group. The prevalence of carotid plaque increased as the estimated cardiovascular risk increased in all subgroups except for preeclampsia group. The area under the curve (AUC) of the Steno-Risk for identifying ≥2 carotid plaques was lower in the preeclampsia group (men: 0.7886, nulliparous women: 0.9026, women without preeclampsia: 0.8230, preeclampsia group: 0.7841; p between groups=0.042). Neither the addition of parity nor preeclampsia in the Steno-Risk led to a statistically significant increase in the AUC. The risk for carotid plaque in women compared to men decreased as exposure to obstetric factors diminished. However, the addition of these factors did not improve the prediction of the Steno-Risk.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call