Abstract

BackgroundEffective treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection requires close cooperation among healthcare professionals. This is because maintaining continuity with treatment regimens is important in anti-HIV therapy. In addition, explaining medication use is more important than that for other diseases. Since 2010, pharmacists at the Mie University Hospital have been interviewing patients, selecting drugs, and formulating medication plans for HIV-positive patients. In August 2011, we established the physician and pharmacist-led collaborative Protocol-based Pharmacotherapy Management (PBPM) to increase the efficacy and safety of treatment, while reducing the burden on physicians. In the present study, we evaluated the outcomes associated with PBPM for HIV pharmacotherapy.MethodsWe prepared protocols for drug selection, timing of interventions, and methods of intervention according to various guidelines. This study included 40 HIV-positive patients receiving outpatient care between January 2009 and February 2017. Of these patients, 17 received treatment before implementing PBPM and 23 patients received treatment afterward. We compared the intervention parameters between before and after the implementation of PBPM.ResultsThe proportion of patients receiving prescription proposals from pharmacists was markedly higher after introducing PBPM (6 out of 17 patients vs. 23 out of 23 patients). All prescription proposals were accepted by physicians before and after PBPM. The number of interviews before antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation (median [range]) decreased from 2 [1–5] to 1 [1–3] after PBPM introduction, suggesting the time to introduction of treatment has been shortened. Before the introduction of PBPM, nine patients required a change in their ART prescriptions and four patients were hospitalized (one patient was hospitalized due to an error in the self-administration of anti-HIV medicines, two patients were hospitalized due to interruptions in medication, and one patient was hospitalized for the treatment of other diseases). Only one patient was hospitalized after PBPM, and was unrelated to drug adherence. The proportion of patients with a reduced HIV-RNA load increased from 71 to 100%. Furthermore, the proportion of patients who maintained levels below the limit of quantitation increased from 59 to 91% after implementing PBPM.ConclusionThe implementation of PBPM for HIV outpatients improves the efficacy and safety of HIV pharmacotherapy.

Highlights

  • Effective treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection requires close cooperation among healthcare professionals

  • Before the introduction of Protocol-based Pharmacotherapy Management (PBPM), nine patients required a change in their Antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescriptions and four patients were hospitalized

  • Of the 17 cases reviewed before the introduction of PBPM, six patients (35%) received a prescription proposal written by a pharmacist to physicians, whereas all 23 cases interviewed by pharmacists after the introduction of PBPM received such proposals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Effective treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection requires close cooperation among healthcare professionals. This is because maintaining continuity with treatment regimens is important in anti-HIV therapy. In August 2011, we established the physician and pharmacist-led collaborative Protocol-based Pharmacotherapy Management (PBPM) to increase the efficacy and safety of treatment, while reducing the burden on physicians. In the United States, pharmacists are legally permitted to order clinical tests, administer medications, and monitor patients according to the Collaborative Drug Therapy Management (CDTM) agreements with doctors [1]. Pharmacists in the United States and Australia actively participate in treating HIV patients, improving treatment outcomes and reducing medical expenses [2, 3]. The PBPM was established as an alternative system where pharmacists participate in treatments based on protocols that are suggested by physicians

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.