Abstract

BackgroundAdherence to antidepressant treatment is essential for the effective management of patients with major depressive disorder. Adherence to medication is a dynamic decision-making process, and pharmacists play an important role in improving adherence to antidepressant treatment in different settings within the healthcare system. The aim of this study was to assess whether pharmacist interventions based on shared decision making improved adherence and patient-related outcomes.MethodsThis was a randomised controlled study with a 6-month follow-up. Participants were randomly allocated to two groups: 1) intervention group (IG) (usual pharmacy services plus pharmacist interventions based on shared decision making); or 2) control group (CG) (usual pharmacy services). Recruited patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: aged 18 to 60 years diagnosed with a major depressive disorder, and no history of psychosis or bipolar disorders. A research assistant blinded to the group allocations collected all data.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomised to the IG (n = 119) or CG (n = 120). Nineteen patients dropped out of the study during the follow-up phase. After 6 months, patients in the IG had significantly more favorable medication adherence, treatment satisfaction, general overuse beliefs, and specific concern beliefs. However, the groups did not differ in severitye of depression or health-related quality of life after 6 months.ConclusionsOur findings emphasise the important role of pharmacists in providing direct patient care in regular pharmacy practice to improve adherence to medications and other patient-reported outcomes.Trial registrationISRCTN34879893, Date assigned: 30/12/2014

Highlights

  • Adherence to antidepressant treatment is essential for the effective management of patients with major depressive disorder

  • The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of shared decision making (SDM)-based pharmacist intervention for improving adherence and patient outcomes, compared with usual care in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD)

  • We conducted a prospective randomised controlled study with a 6-month follow-up, beginning by randomly grouping participants into either: 1) the intervention group (IG; usual pharmacy services plus pharmacist intervention based on SDM); or 2) the control group (CG; usual pharmacy services without SDM-based pharmacist intervention)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adherence to antidepressant treatment is essential for the effective management of patients with major depressive disorder. Adherence to medication is a dynamic decision-making process, and pharmacists play an important role in improving adherence to antidepressant treatment in different settings within the healthcare system. The aim of this study was to assess whether pharmacist interventions based on shared decision making improved adherence and patient-related outcomes. Adherence to antidepressant treatment is essential for the effective management of major depressive disorder (MDD) [2]. Adherence to medication is part of a decision-making process. Patients actively make decisions about their medications after weighing their reservations against the perceived benefits [5]. Patients’ authority and their participation in the decision-making process have increased in the last two decades [7, 8].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call