Abstract

BackgroundChildren with cancer are at high risk for clinical deterioration and subsequent mortality. Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) have proven to reduce the frequency of clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients. This qualitative study evaluates provider perspectives on the impact of PEWS on quality of care during deterioration events in a high-resource and a resource-limited setting.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 83 healthcare staff (nurses, pediatricians, oncology fellows, and intensivists) involved in recent deterioration events at two pediatric oncology hospitals of different resource levels: St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (SJCRH; n = 42) and Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP; n = 41). Interviews were conducted in the participant’s native language (English or Spanish), translated into English, and transcribed. Transcripts were coded and analyzed inductively.ResultsProviders discussed both positive and negative perspectives of clinical deterioration events. Content analysis revealed “teamwork,” “experience with deterioration,” “early awareness,” and “effective communication” as themes associated with positive perception of events, which contributed to patient safety. Negative themes included “lack of communication,” “inexperience with deterioration,” “challenges with technology”, “limited material resources,” “false positive score,” and “objective tool.” Participants representing all disciplines across both institutions shared similar positive opinions. Negative opinions, however, differed between the two institutions, with providers at UNOP highlighting limited resources while those at SJCRH expressing concerns about technology misuse.ConclusionProviders that care for children with cancer find PEWS valuable to improve the quality of hospital care, regardless of hospital resource-level. Identified challenges, including inadequate critical care resources and challenges with technology, differ by hospital resource-level. These findings build on growing data demonstrating the positive impact of PEWS on quality of care and encourage wide dissemination of PEWS in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • Pediatric patients with cancer are at risk for clinical deterioration due to multiple factors, including cancer-related complications and treatment-associated toxicities [1]

  • We evaluate the impact of Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) on provider perceptions of care provided to deteriorating pediatric oncology patients at two hospitals of different resource levels

  • Interviews were conducted during the fall of 2018 at two hospitals dedicated to the care of children with cancer: Unidad Nacional de Oncologıá Pediátrica (UNOP) in Guatemala City, Guatemala and St

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pediatric patients with cancer are at risk for clinical deterioration due to multiple factors, including cancer-related complications and treatment-associated toxicities [1]. PEWS are bedside tools composed of a scoring instrument and an associated intervention algorithm used to proactively identify clinical deterioration and facilitate early transfer to the ICU [4]. PEWS have been validated for use with pediatric oncology patients, including in resource limited settings [5,6,7], and have been shown to reduce frequency of clinical deterioration in hospitalized pediatric cancer patients [8] and improve interdisciplinary communication [9, 10]. Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) have proven to reduce the frequency of clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients. This qualitative study evaluates provider perspectives on the impact of PEWS on quality of care during deterioration events in a high-resource and a resource-limited setting

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call