Impact of Patient-Specific Hip Joint Geometry on the Morphology of Acetabular Fractures

Abstract

Background: Acetabular fractures continue to pose a major challenge in clinical practice, not least because of the growing geriatric population. While the influence of the force vectors on fracture formation is well established, the impact of anatomical factors on fracture morphology remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate patient-specific hip joint geometry, identify structural risk factors and correlate these with the resulting fracture patterns. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included 226 patients (Mdn age = 58 yrs.) with acetabular fracture categorized by Judet/Letournel and the AO/OTA classification. Computed tomography (CT) datasets of the injured and contralateral sides were analyzed using multiplanar reconstruction. Parameters included modified center-edge (CE) angle (Wiberg), rotation angles (Ullmann and Anda), acetabular sector angle (Anda), true caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, femoral head diameter and volume, as well as femoral neck length, circumference, and diameter. In addition, intrarater reliability within a subcohort was assessed for the metric measurements and inter-rater analysis for the classification of the entire sample. Results: The primary analysis showed direct effects of femoral head diameter, femoral neck length and femoral head size on the fracture type according to AO/OTA (type A/B/C), whereby this effect was particularly seen between type A and type C fractures (p = 0.001). Ordinal regression identified femoral head diameter as the only significant predictor (p = 0.02), with a 25% increased likelihood of complex fractures per unit of change. Low-energy trauma doubled the risk of severe fractures. Specific findings include a higher acetabular anteversion in anterior column fractures. Age correlated positively with the cause of injury and fracture type. The inter-rater reliability for fracture classification was excellent, as was the intrarater reliability of the measurements. Conclusions: This study suggests that anatomical factors, particularly proximal femoral geometry, have an impact on acetabular fracture morphology—in addition to factors such as trauma type and patient demographics.