Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of using monopolar thermal coagulation based on radiofrequency (RF) currents on intraoperative blood loss during liver resection.Materials and methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial was planned. Patients undergoing hepatectomy were randomised into two groups. In the control group (n = 10), hemostasis was obtained with a combination of stitches, vessel-sealing bipolar RF systems, sutures or clips. In the monopolar radiofrequency coagulation (MRFC) group (n = 18), hemostasis was mainly obtained using an internally cooled monopolar RF electrode.Results: No differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between groups. Mean blood loss during liver resection in the control group was more than twice that of the MRFC group (556 ± 471 ml vs. 225 ± 313 ml, p = .02). The adjusted mean bleeding/transection area was also significantly higher in the control group (7.0 ± 3.3 ml/cm2 vs. 2.8 ± 4.0 ml/cm2, p = .006). No significant differences were observed in the rate of complications between the groups.Conclusions: The findings suggest that the monopolar electrocoagulation created with an internally cooled RF electrode considerably reduces intraoperative blood loss during liver resection.

Highlights

  • Intraoperative blood loss and perioperative transfusion increases mortality and morbidity and reduces long-term survival after hepatic resection in liver tumours [1,2]

  • 28 patients were enrolled in the study, and were randomly allocated to the control group or the monopolar RF coagulation (MRFC) group

  • Eighty-two patients were subjected to liver resection but were excluded for the following reasons: primary liver tumours (n 1⁄4 54), cyst tumour (n 1⁄4 16) and others (n 1⁄4 12)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intraoperative blood loss and perioperative transfusion increases mortality and morbidity and reduces long-term survival after hepatic resection in liver tumours [1,2]. The most important resection techniques generally used today are finger fracture or the crush/clamp technique, Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA, Cavitron, Stamford, CT), water-jet technology, stapler, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical electrodes [4,5,6,7]. Different sealing devices such as harmonic scalpels, ultrasound scissors, radiofrequency-based monopolar and bipolar vessel-sealing systems have recently gained importance in liver surgery [8,9,10,11,12]. The optimal transection technique has still not been found and using different energy-based devices for different steps of the operation is cumbersome in terms of the flow procedure and a certain degree of skill is required for their proper use [9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.