Abstract

BackgroundAfter more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process. MethodsPublicly available data for the time series of COVID-19 cases and deaths and weather were analyzed at the metropolitan level. The time-varying reproductive numbers (Rt) based on retrospective moving average were used to explore the trends. Student t-tests were used to compare temperature and peak Rt cross-sectionally. ResultsWe found that virus transmissibility, measured by instantaneous reproduction number (Rt), had declined since the end of March for all areas and almost all of them reached a Rt of 1 or below after April 15, 2020. The timing of the main decline was concurrent with the implementation of mitigating interventions. However, the Rts remained around 1 for most areas since then and there were some small and short rebounds in some areas, suggesting a persistent epidemic in those areas when interventions were relaxed. Cities with warm temperature also tended to have a lower peak Rt than that of cities with cold temperature. However, they were not statistically significant and large geographic variations existed. ConclusionsAggressive interventions might have mitigated the current pandemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak.

Highlights

  • The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) infection [1] has affected more than 5.5 million people and caused over 347,500 deaths worldwide, and induced significant anxiety among the public [2]

  • Since about 80% of deaths occurred among elderly people[24], we compared the ratios of deaths to the size of elderly population among metropolitan areas

  • The reproduction number (Rt) remained around 1 in most areas and there were a few small and short rebounds in some regions, suggesting the epidemic was persistent in those areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) infection [1] has affected more than 5.5 million people and caused over 347,500 deaths worldwide (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html, accessed May 26, 2020), and induced significant anxiety among the public [2]. In the 2003 SARS epidemic, the virus went away after June 2003 and never came back[3] By late 2020, it is possible the coronavirus may circulate back to the northern hemisphere, leading to a second wave of epidemic[8]. It is important to empirically evaluate the effects of mitigating interventions and examine whether temperature may affect the virus transmissibility and virulence. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process. Conclusions: Aggressive interventions might have mitigated the current epidemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have some weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call