Impact of misdiagnosis on the treatment and prognosis of acute aortic syndrome

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) embraces a spectrum of pathologies with relatively low prevalence but associated with high mortality. The clinical presentation of AAS is highly variable and the differential diagnosis with other much more common diseases such as myocardial infarction (AMI) or pulmonary embolism (PE) is often difficult to achieve. AAS detection requires a high index of suspicion and the delay in diagnosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Purpose The aim of this study is to characterize the diagnostic approach to AAS patients in the emergency department (ED) and to study the impact of the initial diagnostic suspicion on the treatment and prognosis of patients with AAS. Methods The "Aorta Code" is an inter-hospital and interdisciplinary care protocol for the management of patients with AAS in a 4-Hospital network. Patients with AAS were prospectively and consecutively collected from 2019 to 2022. The sample was classified into two groups according to whether the initial suspicion was AAA or another clinical entity. The diagnosis of AAS was established by computed tomography in all patients. Time, clinical, treatment and prognostic variables were analyzed. Results A total of 113 patients with AAS were included. Of them, only 38% (34) were initially suspected of having an AAS (Figure). AMI and PE were the initial diagnosis in 34% of patients (Figure). There were no significant differences in age, history of hypertension or other cardiovascular risk factors between the groups (table). Anterior chest pain was more frequent in the "AAS-suspicion" group. The diagnostic time delay was longer in patients with initial misdiagnosis (table). Patients with type A AAS with initial misdiagnosis underwent surgery in a lower proportion (table). Although the differences were not significant, patients with initial misdiagnosis had more postoperative complications and higher mortality. Conclusion It is essential to maintain a high index of diagnostic suspicion for AAS in the ED. Initial misdiagnosis is associated with a delayed diagnosis, delayed surgical treatment and a lower rate of surgery. In addition, although it is a small sample size, this group of patients had more postoperative complications and higher mortality.