Abstract
The frequent and persistent cloud cover in the Arctic limits the extent to which sea surface temperature (SST) can be retrieved from thermal infrared (IR) satellite sensors. Passive microwave (PMW) observations provide highly complementary information to IR, enabling measurements through non-precipitating clouds, although at a coarser spatial resolution. The differences in coverage, accuracy, footprint size, spatial resolution and error characteristics between IR and PMW SSTs require a systematic assessment of how to best combine IR and PMW SST retrievals. This is provided in this study on the basis of the ESA-CCI PMW SST climate data record (CDR) and an existing IR-based gap-free SST and sea ice surface temperature CDR covering the Arctic (>58°N), where cloud cover is a serious limitation to IR sensors. An important step towards a combined IR and PMW SST CDR is to correct for systematic biases in the PMW and IR SST datasets relative to each other. The PMW SSTs show reduced biases against in situ SSTs compared to the IR SSTs, but for consistency with time periods when no Arctic PMW SSTs were available, the PMW SSTs have been adjusted to the IR SSTs in this study. This is done using a dynamic bias correction to generate a consistent combined IR and PMW Arctic SST CDR for the period 2002–2017. Including PMW SSTs reduces the standard deviations from 0.54 °C, 0.55 °C and 0.47 °C to 0.47 °C, 0.54 °C and 0.41 °C against drifters, moorings and Argo floats, respectively. The improved performance is seen in almost all regions (including those already covered by IR observations), with the largest improvement in IR data sparse regions. The average theoretical uncertainty reduces by 0.08 °C, which is in good agreement with the observed improvement in the standard deviation against drifters. The results are very promising and expected to improve even further in the future with the launch of the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR), which will enable PMW SST retrievals with lower uncertainties and much closer to coasts and sea ice (where the largest uncertainties arise) than what is possible with previous and current PMW radiometers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.