Abstract
In this paper, we compare how radiation-induced soft errors affect the execution results of user-level applications on different processor cores that implement the same instruction set architecture (ISA). We target two processor cores that support the same RISC-V ISA but have significant differences in their microarchitectural implementations (in-order versus out-of-order). The observed results from fault injection experiments show very strong correlations between the resulting effects from those two processor cores. This strong correlation property is not observed between the processor cores that have different ISAs. Based on this observation, we discuss how the resulting effects of soft errors on a target processor core can be predicted using a reduced set of fault injection experiments with a small number of benchmark applications. Using our heuristic method of selecting the applications to be used for the fault injection experiments on the target processor core, we achieved a high prediction accuracy with prediction errors of less than 7%. Our approach can be used for rapid error resilience evaluation of system designs that have the same ISA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.