Abstract

[6] Nilsen KB, Christiansen SE, Holmen LB, Sand T. The effect of a mental stressor on Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is the phenomenon hrough which the conditioning stimulus affects the test stimuus [1]. Such phenomenon is previously termed “Diffuse noxious nhibitory controls (DNIC)” [2], which is known as “pain inhibits ain phenomenon (inhibitory CPM)”. It has been reported that the CPM effect is impaired in, e.g. usculoskeletal pain patients [3]. Moreover, there is an indication hat the attenuated CPM might be relevant to stress [4]. Although tresswould reduce pain [5], the effect ofmental stressor on CPM is nclear to date. The elucidation of the relationship betweenmental tressor and CPM may play a key role to reveal such a complicated ndogenous pain inhibitory phenomenon in chronic pain patients. The study of Kristian B. Nilsen and co-workers in theis issue f the Scandinavian Journal of Pain [6] investigated the effect of a ental stressor on CPM on young healthy human subjects. Conitioning stimulus was induced with tourniquet. The test stimuli ereheatpain threshold, supra-thresholdheatpain level, andpresure pain threshold. Stressful task was to subtract 7 from 1000 uccessively for five minutes. The applied methodology for test timuli and the conditioning stimulus is common to test CPM [7]. In ddition, a well-established stressful test was employed. Measureents of CPM effect were performed at baseline, after a stressful ask, and after a non-stressful task. The CPMeffectswere calculated s thedifferencebetween the threshold/level after the conditioning timulus and the baseline threshold/level. The results showed that the CPM effect was significantly higher fter the non-stressful task compared to the stressful task. This is he first study to systematically investigate the effect of mental tressor on CPM.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call