Impact of Medicaid expansion on pregnancy outcomes among women with gestational diabetes.

BackgroundThe decision to initiate pharmacotherapy is integral in the care for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We sought to compare pregnancy outcomes between two threshold percentages of elevated glucose values prior to initiation of pharmacotherapy for GDM. We hypothesized that a lower threshold at pharmacotherapy initiation will be associated with lower rates of adverse perinatal outcomes.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of women with GDM delivering in a single tertiary care center. Pregnancy outcomes were compared using bivariable and multivariable analyses between women who started pharmacotherapy (insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent) after a failed trial of dietary modifications at two different ranges of elevated capillary blood glucose (CBG) values: Group 1 when 20–39% CBG values were above goal; Group 2 when ≥40% CBG values were above goal. The primary outcome was a composite GDM-associated neonatal adverse outcome that included: macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA), shoulder dystocia, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy, respiratory distress syndrome, stillbirth, and neonatal demise. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery, preterm birth (< 37 weeks), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and small for gestational age (SGA).ResultsA total of 417 women were included in the study. In univariable analysis, the composite neonatal outcome was statistically significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (47.9% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.001). In addition, rates of preterm birth (15.7% vs 7.4%, p = 0.011), NICU admission (11.7% vs 4.0%, p = 0.006), and LGA (21.2% vs 9.1% p = 0.001) were higher in Group 2. In contrast, higher rates of SGA were noted in Group 1 (8.0% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in cesarean section rates. These findings persisted in multivariable analysis after adjusting for confounding factors (composite neonatal outcome aOR = 0.50, 95%CI [0.31–0.78]).ConclusionsInitiation of pharmacotherapy for GDM when 20–39% of CBG values are above goal, compared to ≥40%, was associated with decreased rates of adverse neonatal outcomes attributable to GDM. This was accompanied by higher rates of SGA among women receiving pharmacotherapy at the lower threshold. Additional studies are required to identify the optimal threshold of abnormal CBG values to initiate pharmacotherapy for GDM.

Label of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Affects Caesarean Section and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission without Conventional Indications

Unexpected term NICU admissions: a marker of obstetrical care quality?

IntroductionThis study aimed to assess whether induction of labor at 41 weeks of gestation improved perinatal outcomes in a low‐risk pregnancy compared with expectant management.Material and methodsRegistry‐based national cohort study in The Netherlands. The study population comprised 239 971 low‐risk singleton pregnancies from 2010 to 2019, with birth occurring from 41+0 to 42+0 weeks. We used propensity score matching to compare induction of labor in three 2‐day groups to expectant management, and further conducted separate analyses by parity. The main outcome measures were stillbirth, perinatal mortality, 5‐min Apgar <4 and <7, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions ≥24 h, and emergency cesarean section rate.ResultsCompared with expectant management, induction of labor at 41+0 to 41+1 weeks resulted in reduced stillbirths (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–0.51) in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Induction of labor increased 5‐min Apgar score <7 (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09–1.55) and NICU admissions ≥24 h (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.53–2.92), particularly in nulliparous women, and increased the cesarean section rate (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.34–1.51). At 41+2–41+3 weeks, induction of labor reduced perinatal mortality (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04–0.43) in both nulliparous and multiparous women. The rate of 5‐min Apgar score <7 was increased (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.50), reaching significance in multiparous women. The cesarean section rate increased (aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.48–1.67) in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Induction of labor at 41+4 to 41+5 weeks reduced stillbirths (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10–0.93). Induction of labor increased rates of 5‐min Apgar score <4 (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.01–2.56) and NICU admissions ≥24 h (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.08–2.13) in nulliparous women. Cesarean section rate was increased (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.38–1.57) in nulliparous and multiparous women.ConclusionsAt 41+2 to 41+3 weeks, induction of labor reduced perinatal mortality, and in all 2‐day groups at 41 weeks, it reduced stillbirths, compared with expectant management. Low 5‐min Apgar score (<7 and <4) and NICU admissions ≥24 h occurred more often with induction of labor, especially in nulliparous women. Induction of labor in all 2‐day groups coincided with elevated cesarean section rates in nulliparous and multiparous women. These findings pertaining to the choice of induction of labor vs expectant management should be discussed when counseling women at 41 weeks of gestation.

Identifying underlying social risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission is important for designing interventions to reduce adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine whether a patient's exposure to community-level stressors as measured by the social vulnerability index (SVI) is associated with NICU admission. Retrospective cohort study (2014-2018) of patients delivering a liveborn ≥ 22 weeks' gestation at a quaternary care center. Patient addresses were used to assign each individual a composite SVI and theme score. The primary exposure was a composite SVI score categorized into tertiles. The primary outcome was NICU admission. Secondary outcomes included NICU length of stay and neonatal morbidity composite. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between composite SVI and outcomes (low SVI as referent). We secondarily compared mean composite and theme SVI scores; individual components of each theme were also compared. From 2014 to 2018, 13,757 patients were included; 2,837 (21%) had a neonate with NICU admission. Patients with higher SVI were more likely to self-identify as Black race and have medical comorbidities. Living in areas with moderate or high SVI was not associated with NICU admission (moderate SVI adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.34; high SVI aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.95-1.33). Moderate SVI was associated with increased neonatal morbidity (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.001-1.38). In an analysis of SVI as a continuous variable, mean SVI scores were significantly higher in individuals who had an infant admitted to the NICU. Those requiring NICU admission lived in areas with lower per capita income and a higher number of mobile homes (p < 0.001). Patients living in areas with moderate or high SVI were not shown to have higher odds of having a neonate admitted to the NICU. Neonatal morbidity was higher in those living in areas with moderate SVI. Increased access to social services may improve neonatal outcomes. · Mean SVI scores are higher in those with a neonate admitted to the NICU.. · There was no observed association between moderate and high SVI scores and NICU admission.. · Moderate SVI is associated with an increased odds of overall neonatal morbidity.. · Greater exposure to low income may be associated with NICU admission..

Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major contributor to adverse pregnancy outcomes both in the United States and globally. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, the incidence of GDM is anticipated to increase as well. Despite the significant impact of GDM on maternal and neonatal health, research examining the independent associations between GDM and adverse outcomes remains limited in the U.S. context. Objective This study aims to address this knowledge gap and further elucidate the relationship between GDM and maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Method We performed a retrospective study using data from the United States Vital Statistics Records, encompassing deliveries that occurred between January 2015 and December 2019. Our analysis aimed to establish the independent association between GDM and various adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The multivariate analysis incorporated factors such as maternal socioeconomic demographics, preexisting comorbidities, and conditions during pregnancy to account for potential confounders and elucidate the relationship between GDM and the outcomes of interest. Result Between 2015 and 2019, there were 1,212,589 GDM-related deliveries, accounting for 6.3% of the 19,249,237 total deliveries during the study period. Among women with GDM, 46.4% were Non-Hispanic Whites, 11.4% were Non-Hispanic Blacks, 25.7% were Hispanics, and 16.5% belonged to other racial/ethnic groups. The median age of women with GDM was 31 years, with an interquartile range of 27-35 years. The cesarean section rate among these women was 46.5%. GDM was identified as an independent predictor of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including cesarean section (OR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.39-1.40), maternal blood transfusion (OR=1.15; 95% CI: 1.12-1.18), intensive care unit admission (OR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.21), neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.52-1.54), assisted ventilation (OR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.35-1.39), and low 5-minute Apgar score (OR=1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03). Conclusion GDM serves as an independent risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, emphasizing the importance of early detection and management in pregnant women.

The rate of maternal and perinatal complications increases after 39 weeks' gestation in both unselected and complicated pregnancies. The aim of this study was to synthesize quantitatively the available evidence on the effect of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks on the risk of Cesarean section, and on maternal and perinatal outcomes. PubMed, US Registry of Clinical Trials, SCOPUS and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to August 2018. Additionally, the references of retrieved articles were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of singleton uncomplicated pregnancies in which participants were randomized between 39 + 0 and 39 + 6 gestational weeks to either induction of labor or expectant management. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The overall quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE guideline. Primary outcomes included Cesarean section, maternal death and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Secondary outcomes included operative delivery, Grade-3/4 perineal laceration, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal infection, hypertensive disease of pregnancy, maternal thrombotic events, length of maternal hospital stay, neonatal death, need for neonatal respiratory support, cerebral palsy, length of stay in NICU and length of neonatal hospital stay. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random-effects models. The meta-analysis included five studies (7261 cases). Induction of labor was associated with a decreased risk for Cesarean section (moderate quality of evidence; RR 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.94); I2 = 0.1%), maternal hypertension (moderate quality of evidence; RR 0.65 (95% CI, 0.57-0.75); I2 = 0%) and neonatal respiratory support (moderate quality of evidence; RR 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.95); I2 = 0%). Neonates born after induction weighed, on average, 81 g (95% CI, 63-100 g) less than those born after expectant management. No significant effects were found for the other outcomes with the available data. The main limitation of our analysis was that the majority of data were derived from a single large study. A second limitation arose from the open-label design of the studies, which may theoretically have affected the readiness of the attending clinician to resort to Cesarean section. Elective induction of labor in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at 39 weeks' gestation is not associated with maternal or perinatal complications and may reduce the need for Cesarean section, risk of hypertensive disease of pregnancy and need for neonatal respiratory support. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as a carbohydrate intolerance with onset or first recognition occurring during pregnancy and GDM could be risk factor for various maternal fetal complications. This study aimed to investigate risks of maternal and neonatal outcomes according to GDM and normal glucose tolerance. This retrospective, observational study included singleton pregnant women who had received a 50-g oral glucose challenge test in 2nd trimester of gestation and gave birth at National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital. Maternal and neonatal complications were compared between GDM and non-GDM groups. Among the 682 women, 56 were diagnosed with GDM and 626 were non-GDM group. Maternal age was older and prepregnant body mass index was higher in GDM. The rate of cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, and transfusion was similar; however, the incidence of preterm birth was higher in GDM. Multivariate analysis, however, showed that GDM was independent risk factor only for preterm birth in <37 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.16–4.36). Regarding neonatal morbidities, APGAR score <7 at 5 minutes and the rate of macrosomia were similar; however, the rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, large for gestational age (LGA), and intubation were higher in GDM. Multivariate analysis, however, showed that GDM was not independent risk factor for LGA, NICU admission, and intubation rate. Compared with the non-GDM group, GDM was associated with an increased likelihood of preterm birth <37 weeks, however, did not increase cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, LGA, and NICU admission rate. This study showed that the majority of women with GDM delivered with similar maternal and neonatal outcomes in non-GDM women.

BackgroundTo evaluate the association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and infant outcomes in women of very advanced maternal age (vAMA) (≥45 years).MethodsThis cohort study utilized data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) database (2014–2019) in the United States. Preterm birth was the primary outcome, which was subdivided into extremely preterm, very preterm, and moderate or late preterm. The secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, low birthweight and small for gestational age. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the association between GDM and infant outcomes among vAMA women. Subgroup analyses were performed based on race and use of infertility treatment. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.ResultsA total of 52,544 vAMA pregnant women were included. All analysis made comparisons between women with vAMA and GDM and women with vAMA and no GDM. Women with GDM had a significantly higher risk of preterm birth than those without GDM (OR = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.18–1.36, P < 0.001). Compared with women without GDM, those with GDM had a significantly increased risk of moderate or late preterm birth (OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.18–1.37, P < 0.001); no significant association of GDM with extremely preterm birth and very preterm birth was observed. Women with GDM had a significantly greater risk of NICU admission than those without (OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.23–1.43, P < 0.001). GDM was associated with a significantly lower risk of low birthweight (OR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.84–0.98, P = 0.010), and no significant association was found between GDM and small for gestational age (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.87–1.03, P = 0.200) in vAMA women.ConclusionvAMA women with GDM had an increased risk of preterm birth, especially moderate or late preterm birth. NICU admission and low birthweight were also associated with GDM among vAMA women.

This study aimed to evaluate the FIB-4 and APRI scores in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and investigate their associations with neonatal outcomes. Additionally, the predictive value of these non-invasive fibrosis indices for GDM and adverse perinatal outcomes was assessed. In this retrospective case-control study, 200 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM and 200 healthy controls were analyzed. Data on maternal demographics, laboratory parameters (ALT, AST, platelet count), FIB-4 and APRI scores, perinatal and neonatal outcomes including fetal growth restriction (FGR), oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, birth weight, gestational age at birth, neonatal cord blood pH, neonatal hypoglycemia, Apgar 1min. and 5min. scores, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were collected. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes among GDM patients. ROC analysis was used to determine the diagnostic performance of both indices. FIB-4 and APRI scores were significantly higher in GDM patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). Among GDM patients, those with FGR, NICU admission, or neonatal death had significantly elevated FIB-4 scores. Stratification by FIB-4 risk categories revealed that patients with high FIB-4 scores had increased rates of FGR, fetal hypoglycemia, adverse perinatal outcomes, and NICU admission (p < 0.01). ROC analysis for predicting GDM yielded AUC values of 0.577 for FIB-4 and 0.571 for APRI. For predicting adverse perinatal outcomes, the FIB-4 AUC was 0.590, while APRI showed limited predictive ability (AUC = 0.511). FIB-4 can serve as a valuable non-invasive marker for liver dysfunction in GDM and is significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Despite limited predictive power, these scores may serve as early indicators of hepatic involvement in GDM.

Perinatal outcome of pregnancies with intrauterine passage of meconium at 37-39 compared with 40-42 weeks' gestation

Background Preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are common pregnancy complications associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. Objectives This study aims to evaluate and compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia, GDM, and the coexistence of both conditions. Methods This retrospective observational study included 230 pregnant women who delivered at Shalamar Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, between January 2023 and December 2024. The participants were divided into three groups: preeclampsia only (n = 80), GDM only (n = 75), and both conditions (n = 75). Results The coexistence of preeclampsia and GDM was associated with the highest rates of cesarean section (82.7%, n= 62), preterm birth (46.7%, n = 35), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (49.3%, n = 37), and neonatal hypoglycemia (18.7%, n = 14). Maternal complications, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission (10.7%, n = 8) and postpartum hemorrhage (9.3%, n = 7), were also more frequent in this group. Logistic regression confirmed that combined preeclampsia and GDM independently predicted adverse outcomes such as cesarean delivery (odds ratio {OR}: 2.4), NICU admission (OR: 2.1), and preterm birth (OR: 1.9). Conclusion It is concluded that the co-occurrence of preeclampsia and GDM significantly worsens both maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to either condition alone. Early diagnosis, multidisciplinary management, and targeted interventions are crucial to mitigating these risks and improving perinatal care.

Objective:This study aimed to compare the postpartum outcomes of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).Methods:This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women with COVID-19. Pregnant women were categorized into two sets as asymptomatic and symptomatic according to their clinics at the time of application. COVID-19 was diagnosed using the real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction on the oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were compared in terms of maternal and perinatal outcomes.Results:Our study population consisted of 20 asymptomatic and 41 symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The rate of primary cesarean section was more than twice in the symptomatic group (51.2%) than that of the asymptomatic group (20%) (p=0.019). Both groups are quite similar in terms of maternal [respiratory support, COVID-19-related treatment, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission], perinatal (preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membrane, preeclampsia, and mode of delivery), and neonatal outcomes [birth weight, Apgar scores, neonatal ICU (NICU) admission]. The rate of total cesarean section in the asymptomatic group (75%) was statistically similar to the symptomatic group (83%) (p=0.464). The NICU admission rate was found to be similar in the asymptomatic (54.2%) and symptomatic groups (50%) (p=0.858). However, NICU admissions were more frequent in the symptomatic group due to respiratory distress (p=0.032). The breastfeeding rate is higher in the asymptomatic pregnant group as expected (p=0.015). Additionally, the ferritin level was significantly lower in the asymptomatic group (p=0.006).Conclusions:The rate of primary cesarean section is quite high in symptomatic patients with COVID-19. Additionally, the total cesarean section rate was extremely high in both groups. We expected more adverse outcomes in symptomatic patients; however, we found similar maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes between both groups.

Objective To evaluate the association between a low 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) value and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients receiving care at a single center tertiary care academic hospital. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with a documented result of a 50-gram, 1-hour GCT performed ≥24 weeks 0 days gestation at a single tertiary care academic hospital from 2013–2021. Patients with a low GCT value, defined as cohort specific ≤10th percentile (<82 mg/dL), were compared to patients with a GCT value ≥82 mg/dL who were not diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GDM) to examine adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Additionally, these comparisons were repeated across patients with low GCT (<82 mg/dL), those with a GCT ≥82 mg/dL without diagnosis of GDM (heretofore referred to as normal glycemic screening) and patients diagnosed with GDM. Our primary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity variable, inclusive of stillbirth, neonatal death, neonatal hypoglycemia with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with NICU admission, respiratory distress with NICU admission, and/or small for gestational age (SGA). Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the association of low GCT value and the composite neonatal morbidity outcome, compared to those with the normal glycemic screening. Results Of 36,342 eligible patients, 3,789 (10.4%) had a low GCT value of <82 mg/dL, 30,729 (84.6%) had a GCT value ≥82 mg/dL and were not diagnosed with GDM, and 1,824 (5.0%) had a diagnosis of GDM. Patients with a low GCT value were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) (12.4% vs 16.3%, p < .01), undergo cesarean delivery (22.8% vs 29.9%, p < .01), or experience postpartum hemorrhage (7.8% vs 9.4%, p < .01) as compared to patients with normal glycemic screening. Compared to newborns whose mothers had normal glycemic screening, newborns of mothers with a low GCT value were significantly more likely to experience the composite morbidity outcome (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08–1.27); this persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09–1.29). Conclusion A low maternal GCT value after 24 weeks gestation is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity in the newborn, driven by higher rates of SGA. Patients with a low GCT value may have underlying maternal hypoglycemia or other glycemic dysregulation affecting fetal development and may benefit from enhanced antenatal surveillance.

Accurate prediction of outcomes for extremely preterm infants (EPIs) during the early stage is important to assist clinicians and parents in making decisions. This study aimed to develop and validate models for predicting mortality and survival without major morbidity for EPIs using information available on neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) admission. Two of the largest contemporary cohorts of EPIs born at 24+0-28+6 weeks' gestation were included in China. Two predictive models were generated separately to predict mortality and survival without major morbidity at discharge. Potential predictors were identified if they had a well-established association with neonatal outcomes in literatures and could be easily obtained on NICU admission, including gestational age, birth weight, sex, inborn, antenatal steroids, 5-min Apgar score, and invasive ventilation on admission. Logistic regression was employed to develop the models. Model performance was assessed via area under the curve (AUC). Among 2,438 EPIs in the development cohort, the mortality rate was 17.7% (431/2,438) and the rate of survival without major morbidity was 52.5% (1,281/2,438). Among the 5,045 infants in the validation cohort, 9.2% (463/5,045) died, and 59.1% (2,981/5,045) survived without major morbidity. Gestational age, birth weight, invasive ventilation on NICU admission, antenatal steroids use, and 5-min Apgar score were selected as predictors in the mortality model, yielding the AUC of 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.79]. For the survival without major morbidity model, predictors were gestational age, birth weight, invasive ventilation on NICU admission, sex, and 5-min Apgar score, and the AUC was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.74). The validation cohort resulted in AUCs of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.78) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68-0.71) for the mortality and survival without major morbidity models, respectively. Using commonly available predictors on NICU admission including gestational age, birth weight, invasive ventilation on NICU admission, antenatal steroids use, sex, and 5-min Apgar score, we successfully developed and validated two distinct models with acceptable performance, predicting mortality and survival without major morbidity for EPIs.