Abstract

BackgroundQuantifying interference of maternal antibodies with immune responses to varying dose schedules of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) is important for the polio endgame as IPV replaces oral polio vaccine (OPV).MethodsType 2 poliovirus humoral and intestinal responses were analyzed using pre-IPV type 2 seropositivity as proxy for maternal antibodies from 2 trials in Latin America. Infants received 1 or 2 doses of IPV in sequential IPV–bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV) or mixed bOPV-IPV schedules.ResultsAmong infants vaccinated with bOPV at age 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age and IPV at 14 weeks, those with type 2 pre-IPV seropositivity had lower seroprotection rates than seronegative infants at 4 weeks (92.7% vs 83.8%; difference, 8.9% [95% confidence interval, 0.6%–19.9%]; n = 260) and 22 weeks (82.7% vs 60.4%; difference, 22.3 [12.8%–32.4%]; n = 481) post-IPV. A second IPV at age 36 weeks resulted in 100% seroprotection in both groups. Among infants vaccinated with 1 IPV at age 8 weeks followed by 2 doses of bOPV, pre-IPV type 2-seropositive infants had lower seroprotection at age 28 weeks than those who were seronegative (93.0% vs 73.9%; difference, 19.6% [95% confidence interval, 7.3%–29.4%]; n = 168). A second dose of IPV at 16 weeks achieved >97% seroprotection at age 24 or 28 weeks, regardless of pre-IPV status. Poliovirus shedding after challenge with monovalent OPV, serotype 2, was higher in pre-IPV seropositive infants given sequential IPV-bOPV. No differences were observed in the mixed bOPV-IPV schedule.ConclusionsThe presence of maternal antibody is associated with lower type 2 post-IPV seroprotection rates among infants who receive a single dose of IPV. This impact persists until late in infancy and is overcome by a second IPV dose.

Highlights

  • Quantifying interference of maternal antibodies with immune responses to varying dose schedules of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) is important for the polio endgame as IPV replaces oral polio vaccine (OPV)

  • Among infants vaccinated with bivalent oral poliovirus (bOPV) at age 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age and IPV at 14 weeks, those with type 2 pre-IPV seropositivity had lower seroprotection rates than seronegative infants at 4 weeks (92.7% vs 83.8%; difference, 8.9% [95% confidence interval, 0.6%–19.9%]; n = 260) and 22 weeks (82.7% vs 60.4%; difference, 22.3 [12.8%–32.4%]; n = 481) post-IPV

  • Among infants vaccinated with 1 IPV at age 8 weeks followed by 2 doses of bOPV, pre-IPV type 2-seropositive infants had lower seroprotection at age 28 weeks than those who were seronegative (93.0% vs 73.9%; difference, 19.6% [95% confidence interval, 7.3%–29.4%]; n = 168)

Read more

Summary

Methods

Type 2 poliovirus humoral and intestinal responses were analyzed using pre-IPV type 2 seropositivity as proxy for maternal antibodies from 2 trials in Latin America. Two phase IV, multicenter, randomized controlled, observer-blinded vaccine trials (IPV001 and IPV002) were conducted in 5 countries in Latin America [12, 13]. For this post hoc and unplanned analysis, we pooled a subset of infants from the original studies. The IPV002 study took place in Santiago de Chile We included in this analysis infants who received 1 dose of IPV at aged 8 weeks, bOPV at 16 and 24 weeks, and mOPV2 challenge at 28 weeks, and infants who received 2 doses of IPV at 8 and 16 weeks, 1 dose of bOPV at 24 weeks, and mOPV2 challenge at 28 weeks (for vaccine manufacturers, see Supplementary Table 1)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call