Impact of lumbar fusion on sitting spinopelvic balance: Multisegmental versus monosegmental

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the differences in sagittal spinopelvic parameters between patients receiving monosegmental or multisegmental lumbar fusion and to assess the impact of fusion length on sitting balance. MethodsThe current study recruited 41 patients who had undergone lumbar fusion, consisting of 18 in the monosegmental group and 23 in the multisegmental group. And the control group included 50 lumbar degenerative patients who had no previous spinal fusion surgery. Spinopelvic parameters of patients were assessed: sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and proximal femur angles. ResultsWe observed significant differences in sitting TK (P = 0.031), LL (P = 0.012), PT (P = 0.009) and SVA (P = 0.009) among the three groups. When transitioning from standing to sitting, the multisegmental group had the least change in SVA (P = 0.016), PT (P = 0.043), and LL (P = 0.009), with a compensatory increase in TK (P = 0.021). Moderate to strong correlations were found between the change in the LL and those in the SVA (r = −0.548, P = 0.001), PT (r = −0.600, P = 0.001), and SS (r = 0.623, P = 0.001). ConclusionMultisegmental lumbar fusion significantly limits the lumbar mobility and affects the ability to compensate postural changes. Reducing the fusion segments as much as possible is of particular value in preserving lumbar mobility and maintaining the compensatory mechanism of spinopelvis.