Abstract

Abstract. A lightning-nitrogen oxide (NO) algorithm is implemented in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) and used to evaluate the impact of lightning-NO emissions (LNOx) on tropospheric photochemistry over the United States during the summer of 2006. For a 500 mole per flash lightning-NO source, the mean summertime tropospheric NO2 column agrees with satellite-retrieved columns to within −5 to +13%. Temporal fluctuations in the column are moderately well simulated; however, the addition of LNOx does not lead to a better simulation of day-to-day variability. The contribution of lightning-NO to the model column ranges from ∼10% in the northern US to >45% in the south-central and southeastern US. Lightning-NO adds up to 20 ppbv to upper tropospheric model ozone and 1.5–4.5 ppbv to 8-h maximum surface layer ozone, although, on average, the contribution of LNOx to model surface ozone is 1–2 ppbv less on poor air quality days. LNOx increases wet deposition of oxidized nitrogen by 43% and total deposition of nitrogen by 10%. This additional deposition reduces the mean magnitude of the CMAQ low-bias in nitrate wet deposition with respect to National Atmospheric Deposition monitors to near zero. Differences in urban/rural biases between model and satellite-retrieved NO2 columns were examined to identify possible problems in model chemistry and/or transport. CMAQ columns were too large over urban areas. Biases at other locations were minor after accounting for the impacts of lightning-NO emissions and the averaging kernel on model columns. In order to obtain an upper bound on the contribution of uncertainties in NOy chemistry to upper tropospheric NOx low biases, sensitivity calculations with updated chemistry were run for the time period of the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX-A) field campaign (summer 2004). After adjusting for possible interferences in NO2 measurements and averaging over the entire campaign, these updates reduced 7–9 km biases from 32 to 17% and 9–12 km biases from 57 to 46%. While these changes lead to better agreement, a considerable unexplained NO2 low-bias remains in the uppermost troposphere.

Highlights

  • Production of nitric oxide (NO) by lightning (LNOx) is an important part of the summertime tropospheric reactive odd nitrogen (NOx = NO + nitrogen dioxide (NO2)) budget over the United States, but it is its most uncertain component

  • In order to determine the enhancement of tropospheric composition over the United States associated with lightningNO emissions, Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) (Byun and Schere, 2006) simulations with and without lightning-NO emissions were performed for the entire year of 2006

  • The scheme assumes flash rates are proportional to the model-calculated convective precipitation rate but adjusts the flash rates locally so that flash rates when averaged over a month approximate National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN)-based estimates of the total flash rate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Napelenok et al (2008) found that low-biases in upper tropospheric NOx in Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) (Byun and Schere, 2006) simulations without lightning-NO emissions made it difficult to constrain ground-level NOx emissions using inverse methods and Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY) (Bovensmann et al, 1999; Sioris et al, 2004; Richter et al, 2005) NO2 retrievals They found that wet deposition of nitric acid (HNO3) at National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) sites was underestimated by a factor of two when LNOx was not included. In order to obtain an upper bound on the contribution of uncertainties in NOy chemistry to upper tropospheric NOx low biases, sensitivity calculations with updated chemistry were run for the time period of the INTEX-A field campaign (summer 2004) in order to determine if lightning-NO and recent improvements in our understanding of NOy chemistry can lead to a better simulation of the upper tropospheric NOx concentrations measured during INTEX-A

NO2 column products from OMI
Ozone profiles from OMI and sondes
CMAQ model and simulations
Specification of lightning-NO source in CMAQ
Evaluation of flash rate distribution in CMAQ
Results
Comparison with NO2 columns
Comparison with ozone profiles and columns
Impact on surface layer ozone
Impact on deposition of nitrogen species
Summary and conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call