Abstract
• Comparison of kinetic models and their influence on the reformer performance. • The different kinetic models converge fast to equilibrium. • The kinetics have little influence on the reformer's performance. • Simplest kinetic models present advantages compared to traditional ones. Catalyzed chemical reactions inside tubular reactors play a key role in steam methane reforming process, as they define the temperature and composition profiles of the reformer and, consequently, its efficiency. Although the kinetic modeling of reforming reactions has already been widely discussed, studies that carry out the comparison between kinetic reform models are still scarce. In this context, this work aims to evaluate the influence of different kinetics on the stationary behavior of industrial reformer. The kinetic models of Singh and Saraf (1979), Numaguchi and Kikuchi (1988), Xu and Froment (1989a), and Hou and Hughes (2001) were analyzed and compared with each other. All models describe the reformer satisfactorily with relative deviations around 3.5% compared to experimental and literature data. The results show that the simplest kinetic models present advantages compared to traditional models, such as Xu and Froment (1989a), which is widely used without any prior analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.