Abstract

PurposeOutcomes are excellent following surgical management of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. Short delays until surgical fixation have been shown to be equivalent to immediate fixation with regards to complications. We hypothesized that insurance coverage may impact access to care and the patient’s ability to return to the operating room for outpatient surgery.MethodsA retrospective review of supracondylar humerus fractures treated at a large urban pediatric hospital from 2008 to 2012 was performed. Fractures were classified by the modified Gartland classification and baseline demographics were collected. Time from discharge to office visits and subsequent surgical fixation was calculated for all type II fractures discharged from the emergency department. Insurance status and primary carrier were collected for all patients.Results2584 supracondylar humerus fractures were reviewed, of which 584 were type II fractures. Of the 577 type II fractures with complete records, 383 patients (61 %) were admitted for surgery and the remaining 194 were discharged with plans for outpatient follow-up. There was no difference in insurance status between patients admitted for immediate surgery. Of the 194 patients who were discharged with type 2 fractures after gentle reduction, 59 patients (30.4 %) ultimately underwent surgical fixation. Of these, 42 patients were privately insured (58.3 % of patients with private insurance), 16 had governmental insurance (15.1 %), and 1 was uninsured (6.3 %). Patients with private insurance were 2.46 times more likely to have surgery than patients with public or no insurance (p = 0.005). Of the 135 patients who did not eventually have surgery, 92 (68.1 %) were seen in the clinic. Patients with private insurance were 2.78 times more likely to be seen back in the clinic when compared to publicly insured or uninsured patients (p = 0.0152).ConclusionsDespite an equivalent number of privately insured and publicly insured patients undergoing immediate surgery for type II fractures, those with public or no insurance who were discharged were 2.46 times less likely to obtain outpatient surgery when compared to privately insured patients. Patient insurance status and the ability to follow up in a timely manner should be assessed at the time of initial evaluation in the emergency department.Level of evidence Level 3

Highlights

  • Outcomes are excellent following surgical management of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures

  • This study aims to evaluate the subset of patients with type II supracondylar humerus fractures with either no insurance or government/public insurance, and whether they suffered a lapse or loss in care due to their insurance status versus patients with private insurance

  • After approval by the institutional review board, a retrospective review was performed of patients with isolated, unilateral Gartland type II supracondylar humerus fractures who were treated within the emergency departments at two metropolitan children’s hospitals between 2008 and 2012 by surgeons in four pediatric orthopedic practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Outcomes are excellent following surgical management of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. Conclusions Despite an equivalent number of privately insured and publicly insured patients undergoing immediate surgery for type II fractures, those with public or no insurance who were discharged were 2.46 times less likely to obtain outpatient surgery when compared to privately insured patients. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has published in its clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures that ‘‘closed reduction with pin fixation [is suggested] for patients with displaced (Gartland type II and III, and displaced flexion) pediatric supracondylar fractures of the humerus’’ [3]. This study aims to evaluate the subset of patients with type II supracondylar humerus fractures with either no insurance or government/public insurance, and whether they suffered a lapse or loss in care due to their insurance status versus patients with private insurance.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.