Impact of induced pseudomyopia and refractive fluctuations of accommodative spasm on visual acuity

Abstract

ABSTRACT Clinical relevance High-contrast visual acuity is disproportionately poor in patients with accommodative spasm subtype of near reflex (SNR-A), relative to uncorrected refractive errors of equivalent magnitude. This exaggerated loss of performance in SNR-A may be explained by the combination of pseudomyopia and its fluctuations, vis-à-vis, each factor considered separately. Background To determine how combinations of pseudomyopic refraction and its temporal variations in SNR-A impact high-contrast visual acuity by inducing these patterns in healthy cyclopleged adults, relative to their baseline acuity. Methods Refractive profiles of 15 patients with SNR-A were obtained from a previous study, averaged, and induced before the right eye of 14 cyclopleged adults (mean ±1 SD age: 22.7 ± 2.6 yrs) by feeding the profile into a coaxially placed, motorised, Badal optometer. LogMAR acuity was measured using the method of constant stimuli: (1) before cycloplegia, (2) after cycloplegia and post-cycloplegia with (3) combination of pseudomyopia and its temporal fluctuations, (4) only pseudomyopia, (5) only temporal fluctuations in refraction about emmetropia, (6) condition 5 with double the amplitude of induced fluctuations and (7) condition 5 with half the amplitude of induced fluctuations. Results The induced refractive fluctuations ranged from −0.80 to −1.75D, around a mean pseudomyopia of −1.20D. Visual acuity deterioration was maximum for the combination of pseudomyopia and temporal fluctuations condition (0.51 ± 0.07logMAR), followed by only pseudomyopia (0.27 ± 0.05logMAR) and only refractive fluctuations conditions (0.17 ± 0.04logMAR), all relative to baseline post-cycloplegia (0.13 ± 0.04logMAR) (p < 0.001). Visual acuity loss increased with doubling of refractive fluctuations (0.20 ± 0.04logMAR), relative to native fluctuations or halving the amplitude (0.15 ± 0.03logMAR) (p < 0.01). Task precision, as adjudged from the slope of psychometric function, followed a similar pattern of loss as visual acuity. Conclusion Combination of induced pseudomyopia and temporal fluctuations in refraction produces an additive loss of visual acuity and task precision, relative to baseline and each factor considered separately.