Impact of Indication for Oocyte and Embryo Reception on Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess if the indication for oocyte reception (OR) or embryo reception (ER) impacts the reproductive and obstetric outcomes by evaluating our experience at a tertiary fertility centre and by performing a literature review on this subject. Several previous studies have reported that, in contrast to other types of fertility treatment, the indication for OR/ER seems to have little impact on the outcomes. However, the compared indication groups vary considerably between these studies, and some data indicates worse outcomes in patients who developed premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) due to Turner syndrome or treatment with chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Design: A retrospective analysis of all cases of OR/ER at a tertiary fertility centre from 2001 until 2020 was conducted. We analysed 584 cycles from 194 individual patients. A literature review on the impact of indication on reproductive or obstetric outcomes of OR/ER was performed using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 27 studies were included and analysed. Participants, Setting, Methods: For the retrospective analysis, patients were divided into three major indication groups: failure of autologous assisted reproductive technology, POI, and genetic disease carrier. To assess reproductive outcomes, we determined pregnancy rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. For comparing obstetric outcomes, we reviewed the term of birth, mode of delivery, and birthweight. Outcomes were compared using Fisher’s exact test, χ² test, and one-way ANOVA utilizing the GraphPad tool. Results: There were no significant differences in reproductive and obstetric outcomes between the three major indication groups in our population, in line with the findings reported by existing literature. Data on impaired reproductive outcomes in patients with POI after chemotherapy/radiotherapy are conflicting. Obstetrically, these patients are at higher risk of preterm birth and possibly also low birthweight, especially after abdomino-pelvic or total body irradiation. For patients with POI due to Turner syndrome, most data suggest similar pregnancy rates but a higher rate of pregnancy loss, and obstetrically an increased risk of hypertensive disorders and caesarean section. Limitations: The small number of patients in the retrospective analysis resulted in low statistical power when evaluating differences between smaller subgroups. There were some missing data on the occurrence of complications during pregnancy. Our analysis covers a period of 20 years, during which several technological innovations have also been made. Conclusions: Our study shows that the important heterogeneity in couples treated with OR/ER does not significantly impact their reproductive or obstetric outcomes, except for POI due to Turner syndrome or treatment with chemotherapy/radiotherapy, where there seems to be an important uterine/endometrial component that cannot be entirely overcome by providing a healthy oocyte.