Impact of inadequate empirical antibiotic treatment on outcome of non-critically ill children with bacterial infections

Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of inadequate empirical antibiotic treatment on patient outcomes and hospitalization duration for non-life-threatening infections in children remains poorly understood. We aimed to assess the effects of inadequate empirical antibiotic treatment on these factors in pediatric patients.MethodsThe medical records of children admitted for infectious diseases with bacteria isolated from sterile sites between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received adequate empirical treatment were compared with those who received inadequate treatment in terms of demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables.ResultsForty-eight patients who received inadequate empirical antimicrobial treatment were compared to 143 patients who received adequate empirical treatment. Inadequate empirical antimicrobial treatment did not significantly affect the length of hospital stay or the incidence of complications in non-critically ill children with bacterial infections. Younger age and underlying renal abnormalities were identified as risk factors for inadequate antimicrobial treatment, while associated bacteremia was more common in the adequate antimicrobial treatment group.Conclusionsinadequate antibiotic treatment did not affect the outcomes of non-critically ill children with bacterial infectious diseases. Therefore, routine empirical broad-spectrum treatment may not be necessary for these cases, as it can lead to additional costs and contribute to antibiotic resistance. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.