Abstract
‘Cell-based’ models provide a powerful computational tool for studying the mechanisms underlying the growth and dynamics of biological tissues in health and disease. An increasing amount of quantitative data with cellular resolution has paved the way for the quantitative parameterisation and validation of such models. However, the numerical implementation of cell-based models remains challenging, and little work has been done to understand to what extent implementation choices may influence model predictions. Here, we consider the numerical implementation of a popular class of cell-based models called vertex models, which are often used to study epithelial tissues. In two-dimensional vertex models, a tissue is approximated as a tessellation of polygons and the vertices of these polygons move due to mechanical forces originating from the cells. Such models have been used extensively to study the mechanical regulation of tissue topology in the literature. Here, we analyse how the model predictions may be affected by numerical parameters, such as the size of the time step, and non-physical model parameters, such as length thresholds for cell rearrangement. We find that vertex positions and summary statistics are sensitive to several of these implementation parameters. For example, the predicted tissue size decreases with decreasing cell cycle durations, and cell rearrangement may be suppressed by large time steps. These findings are counter-intuitive and illustrate that model predictions need to be thoroughly analysed and implementation details carefully considered when applying cell-based computational models in a quantitative setting.
Highlights
Computational modelling is increasingly used in conjunction with experimental studies to understand the selforganisation of biological tissues [1,2]
We find that vertex model predictions are sensitive to the length of cell cycle duration, the time step, and the size of the edge length threshold for cell rearrangement
Vertex models are typically used to predict summary statistics of cell packing and growth, such as the distribution of cell neighbour numbers and areas [3,25]. We analyse how these summary statistics depend on simulation parameters
Summary
Computational modelling is increasingly used in conjunction with experimental studies to understand the selforganisation of biological tissues [1,2]. Popular computational models include ‘cell-based’ models that simulate tissue behaviour with cellular resolution. J. Kursawe et al / Journal of Computational Physics 345 (2017) 752–767 scales, may suffer from numerical instabilities [10,11], and many such models include parameters of numerical approximation or parameters that have no direct physical correlate. Kursawe et al / Journal of Computational Physics 345 (2017) 752–767 scales, may suffer from numerical instabilities [10,11], and many such models include parameters of numerical approximation or parameters that have no direct physical correlate These issues are of growing importance as cell-based models become used in an increasingly quantitative way [12,13,14]. We need to be aware of any impacts that numerical implementation choices may have on model predictions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.