Abstract

This study investigated the correlation between bone characteristics, the design of orthodontic mini-implants, the pull-out force, and primary stability. This experimental in vitro study has examined commercial orthodontic mini-implants of different sizes and designs, produced by two manufacturers: Tomas-pin SD (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) and Perfect Anchor (Hubit, Seoul, Korea). The total number of 40 mini-implants were tested. There are two properties that are common to all tested implants—one is the material of which they are made (titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V), and the other is the method of their insertion. The main difference between the mini-implants, which is why they have been selected as the subject of research in the first place, is reflected in their geometry or design. Regardless of the type of implant, the average pull-out forces were found to be higher for a cortical bone thickness (CBTC) of 0.62–0.67 mm on average, compared to the CBTC < 0.62 mm, where the measured force averages were found to be lower. The analysis of variance tested the impact of the mini-implant geometry on the pull-out force and proved that there is a statistically significant impact (p < 0.015) of all three analyzed geometric factors on the pull-out force of the implant. The design of the mini-implant affects its primary stability. The design of the mini-implant affects the pulling force. The bone quality at the implant insertion point is important for primary stability; thus, the increase in the cortical bone thickness increases the value of the pulling force significantly.

Highlights

  • The introduction of mini-implants into orthodontics stands out as one of the most significant changes in clinical work [1]

  • The specific purpose of this study was to identify the correlation between the bone properties, the geometrical design of commercial orthodontic mini-implants, pull-out forces, and primary stability

  • This study was focused on the impact of bone quality and the impact of mini-implant design on primary stability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The introduction of mini-implants into orthodontics stands out as one of the most significant changes in clinical work [1]. From a clinical point of view, the screw consists of three parts: the head, which can have a different shape; the transgingival part; and the threaded body, which is mainly in form of a cylinder, cone, or a combination of the two. In the current practice of using mini-implants, the preference is given to a smaller diameter and lower profile of the head for better hygiene and greater comfort for the patient In essence, these are self-tapping bone screws with a diameter of 1.5–2.5 mm and a length of 6–10 mm, with different lengths of the transmucosal neck (1.5–2.5 mm) which compensate for the thickness of the mucosa. A chain or loop of a Ni–Ti tension spring is applied to the ball, and a wire is applied to the slot

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call