Abstract

Simple SummaryIntra-and inter-tumor heterogeneity characterizes breast cancer disease not only in terms of intrinsic cancer cell features, but also of its surrounding microenvironment that can be characterized by different stromal and immune cell types. Nonetheless, triple-negative breast cancers and HER2+ tumors are considered, among breast cancer molecular subtypes, the most immune infiltrated, and the level of TILs generally indicates a good prognosis. It is now clear that both cancer cell molecular heterogeneity and heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment contribute to modulating the response to anti-HER2 agents. Uncovering all these levels of complexity will be a critical step in the design of patient-tailored treatments; additionally, recent technological advances in the analysis of tumor tissues, such as ssRNAseq and digital pathology, will be key in this process.Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a high degree of diversity among and within tumors, and in relation to its different tumor microenvironment. Compared to other oncotypes, such as melanoma or lung cancer, breast cancer is considered a “cold” tumor, characterized by low T lymphocyte infiltration and low tumor mutational burden. However, more recent evidence argues against this idea and indicates that, at least for specific molecular breast cancer subtypes, the immune infiltrate may be clinically relevant and heterogeneous, with significant variations in its stromal cell/protein composition across patients and tumor stages. High numbers of tumor-infiltrating T cells are most frequent in HER2-positive and basal-like molecular subtypes and are generally associated with a good prognosis and response to therapies. However, effector immune infiltrates show protective immunity in some cancers but not in others. This could depend on one or more immunosuppressive mechanisms acting alone or in concert. Some of them might include, in addition to immune cells, other tumor microenvironment determinants such as the extracellular matrix composition and stiffness as well as stromal cells, like fibroblasts and adipocytes, that may prevent cytotoxic T cells from infiltrating the tumor microenvironment or may inactivate their antitumor functions. This review will summarize the state of the different immune tumor microenvironment determinants affecting HER2+ breast tumor progression, their response to treatment, and how they are modified by different therapeutic approaches. Potential targets within the immune tumor microenvironment will also be discussed.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women worldwide [1]

  • To mention a few studies on this topic, Sotiriou’s group investigated the correlation between quantity and location of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), at diagnosis, with the clinical outcome in more than 2000 node-positive BC samples from the BIG 02-98 adjuvant phase III trial comparing different chemotherapy regimens. While they did not find any prognostic association globally or in the Estrogen Receptor (ER)+/HER2- group, in HER2+ BC they observed a significant interaction between increasing stromal TILs (10% increments) and with chemotherapy benefit based on anthracycline only [29]

  • Some studies have been designed to characterize immune and microenvironmental changes occurring after a single cycle of HER2-targeted therapy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women worldwide [1]. BC is characterized by high inter-tumor heterogeneity which is based on the different identities of initiating cells undergoing malignant expansion. The last is evident in the case of the hypoxic microenvironment that might force the development of metastases [3] In this scenario, a further level of complexity is added by the existence of an intratumor clonal level of heterogeneity in which somatic mutations drive the formation of subclones endowed with different biological properties that can be sustained in their tumorigenicity by specific local factors/cells forming specialized “niches”. A further level of complexity is added by the existence of an intratumor clonal level of heterogeneity in which somatic mutations drive the formation of subclones endowed with different biological properties that can be sustained in their tumorigenicity by specific local factors/cells forming specialized “niches” In this context, the extracellular matrix might play a relevant role in sustaining pro-tumorigenic signals and favoring the establishment of an immune-suppressive microenvironment [4]. A critical aspect related to the characterization of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is to understand how it evolves and to find out possible common traits that, if conserved upon anti-tumor therapy or during metastatic dissemination, might represent the Achille’s heel of a tumor

Cellular Composition of the Tumor Microenvironment
Adaptive Immune Cells
Innate Immune Cells
Evaluation of Treatment
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call