Abstract

Accurate and early prediction of breast cancer recurrence is crucial to guide medical decisions and treatment success. Machine learning (ML) has shown promise in this domain. However, its effectiveness critically depends on proper hyperparameter setting, a step that is not always performed systematically in the development of ML models. In this study, we aimed to highlight the impact that this process has on the final performance of ML models through a real-world case study by predicting the five-year recurrence of breast cancer patients. We compared the performance of five ML algorithms (Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, eXtreme Gradient Boost, and Deep Neural Network) before and after optimizing their hyperparameters. Simpler algorithms showed better performance using the default hyperparameters. However, after the optimization process, the more complex algorithms demonstrated superior performance. The AUCs obtained before and after adjustment were 0.7 vs. 0.84 for XGB, 0.64 vs. 0.75 for DNN, 0.7 vs. 0.8 for GB, 0.62 vs. 0.7 for DT, and 0.77 vs. 0.72 for LR. The results underscore the critical importance of hyperparameter selection in the development of ML algorithms for the prediction of cancer recurrence. Neglecting this step can undermine the potential of more powerful algorithms and lead to the choice of suboptimal models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.