Impact of hospital safety-net status on clinical outcomes following carotid artery revascularization

Abstract

BackgroundHigh hospital safety-net burden has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes. We aimed to characterize the association of safety-net burden with outcomes in a national cohort of patients undergoing carotid interventions. MethodsThe 2010–2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify adults undergoing carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Hospitals were classified as low (LBH), medium, or high safety-net burden (HBH) based on the proportion of uninsured or Medicaid patients. Multivariable models were developed to evaluate associations between HBH and outcomes. ResultsOf an estimated 540,558 hospitalizations for a carotid intervention, 28.5% were at HBH. Patients treated at HBH were more likely to be admitted non-electively (28.7% vs 20.2%, P < .001), have symptomatic presentation (11.0% vs 7.7%, P < .001), and undergo carotid artery stenting (18.7% vs 8.9%, P < .001). After adjustment, HBH remained associated with increased odds of postoperative stroke (AOR 1.19, P = .023, Ref = LBH), non-home discharge (AOR 1.10, P = .026), 30-day readmissions (AOR 1.14, P < .001), and 31–90-day readmissions (AOR 1.13, P < .001), but not in-hospital mortality (AOR 1.18, P = .27). HBH was linked to increased hospitalization costs (β +$2,169, P = .016). ConclusionHBH was associated with postoperative stroke, non-home discharge, readmissions, and increased hospitalization costs after carotid revascularization. Further studies are warranted to alleviate healthcare inequality and improve outcomes at safety-net hospitals.