Abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of patient position (supine and prone) on conventional bilateral field, three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and inte nsity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans in patients of brainstem glioma with a view to exploring the possibility of avoiding beam entry through immobilization access o- ries.Methods:Five patients of brainstem glioma were immobilized and scanned in supine and prone positions with a combin a- tion of head rest and thermoplastic cast. Each patient was planned with three techniques: (i) 2 -fields bilateral (ii) 3 -fields 3DCRT, and (iii) 5 -fields IMRT. Plan quality was analyzed in terms of planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose to var i- ous critical organs at risk (OAR) for both the supine and prone treatment positions. Results:In case of bilateral fields (parallel opposed) planning, th e PTV coverage and dose to the OAR were almost similar for both the supine and prone positions. In 3DCRT plan, although the PTV coverage and dose to critical structures were comparable for both the supine and prone pos i- tion, dose to cochlea was lower for t he prone position plan. A modest decrease in maximum dose to optic nerves and mean dose to temporal lobes were also observed for the prone position plan. In IMRT plans, the PTV coverage and homogeneity were comparable in both the supine and prone positions . Reduction in average maximum and mean doses to all OAR swith function- al subunit (FSU) in series and parallel respectively was observed in the IMRT plan for prone position when compared to the supine position.Conclusion:Supine and prone positions result ed in almost similar dose distribution in all the three techniques applied. At some instances, the prone position showed better normal tissues sparing when compared to supine. Moreover, prone position is more likely to avoid attenuation due to immobilizati on devices and uncertainty in dose calculation under large i n- homogeneities.

Highlights

  • The immobilization accessories used for patient positioning are not completely radio-translucent and sometime large air gap may be created in the path of the beam before entering the patient body

  • With a view to exploring the possibility of avoiding beam entry through immobilization accessories, we conducted a dosimetric study to analyze the impact of patient position on conventional bilateral field, three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-conformal radiation therapy (CRT)) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans in patients of brainstem glioma

  • planning target volume (PTV) The maximum and minimum value of Coverage index (CI) were observed as 0.9824 ± 0.01 (IMRT supine) and 0.9525 ± 0.03 (2F-bilateral supine), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The immobilization accessories used for patient positioning are not completely radio-translucent and sometime large air gap may be created in the path of the beam before entering the patient body. This may result in uncertainty in dose calculation in absence of proper dose calculation algorithm.[1] American association of physicists in medicine (AAPM) Task Group 176 illustrates the dosimetric effects of a wide range of devices used for immobilization of the patient. Plan quality was analyzed in terms of target coverage, dose homogeneity, and critical organ sparing in both the afore-mentioned treatment positions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call