Impact of gender on long-term outcomes after surgical repair for acute Stanford A aortic dissection: a propensity score matched analysis.

Abstract

Previous research suggests that female gender is associated with increased mortality rates after surgery for Stanford A acute aortic dissection (AAD). However, women with AAD usually present with different clinical symptoms that may bias outcomes. Moreover, there is a lack of long-term results regarding overall mortality and freedom from major cerebrovascular events. We analysed the impact of gender on long-term outcomes after surgery for Stanford A AAD by comparing genders with similar risk profiles using propensity score matching. A total of 240 patients operated for Stanford A AAD were included in this study. To control for selection bias and other confounders, propensity score matching was applied to gender groups. After propensity score matching, the gender groups were well balanced in terms of risk profiles. There were no statistically significant differences regarding duration of cardiopulmonary bypass ( P = 0.165) and duration of aortic cross-clamp time ( P = 0.111). Female patients received less fresh frozen plasma ( P = 0.021), had shorter stays in the intensive care unit ( P = 0.031), lower incidence of temporary neurological dysfunction ( P < 0.001) and lower incidence of dialysis ( P = 0.008). There were no significant differences regarding intraoperative mortality ( P = 1.000), 30-day mortality ( P = 0.271), long-term overall cumulative survival ( P = 0.954) and long-term freedom from cerebrovascular events ( P = 0.235) with up to a 9-year follow-up. Considering patients with similar risk profiles, female gender per se is not associated with worse long-term survival and freedom from stroke after surgical aortic repair. Moreover, female patients might even benefit from a smoother early postoperative course and lower incidence of early postoperative complications.