Abstract

This paper empirically studies the impact of female proportion and the background of the board on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure of Taiwanese listed firms. The different groups of board size are detected by the structural break test, which is used as the threshold for dividing subsamples. The results show that the higher proportion of women and accounting background of board of directors, the more CSR disclosure for firms with more than 11 directors in the board, implying that women and accounting background directors can only promote their compassionate and reciprocal in CSR decision-making in large board firms. Overall, the empirical results poorly support the efficiency hypothesis suggesting that the board of directors is more powerful when it has high gender diversity. This study also confirms that the linear regression method may not be able to fully present the various possible relationships between the variables.

Highlights

  • Businesses cannot exist and operate in a vacuum

  • The results show that the higher proportion of women and accounting background of board of directors, the more corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure for firms with more than 11 directors in the board, implying that women and accounting background directors can only promote their compassionate and reciprocal in CSR decision-making in large board firms

  • Gender issues are recently discussed in a more focused manner in the context of CSR as it is increasingly thought that companies with a higher number of women in the board are better at practicing corporate social responsibility and sustainable development than others, and have brought great things to business and society

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Businesses cannot exist and operate in a vacuum. Their relationship with society and the environment is a critical factor in their long-term sustainability, which increasingly being used to measure their overall performance. Gender issues are recently discussed in a more focused manner in the context of CSR as it is increasingly thought that companies with a higher number of women in the board are better at practicing corporate social responsibility and sustainable development than others, and have brought great things to business and society. The “Corporate Governance Assessment” system is used as a criterion of CSR engagement

LITERATURE REVIEW
Empirical model
RESULTS
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call