Impact of furosemide on mortality and the requirement for renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the impact of furosemide on mortality and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in adult patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) based on current evidence.Data sourcesPubMed (Medline) and Embase were searched from 1998 to October 2018.Study selectionWe retrieved data from randomised controlled trials comparing prevention/treatment with furosemide at any stage of AKI with alternative treatment/standard of care/placebo. The outcome was short-term mortality and the requirement for RRT, when applicable.Data extractionTwo reviewers independently extracted appropriate data. PRISMA guidelines were followed for data preparation and reporting.Data synthesisWe identified 20 relevant studies (2608 patients: 1330 in the treatment arm and 1278 in the control arm). Heterogeneity between studies was deemed acceptable, and the publication bias was low. Furosemide had neither an impact on mortality (OR = 1.015; 95% CI 0.825–1.339) nor the need for RRT (OR = 0.947; 95% CI 0.521–1.721). Furosemide had also no effect on the outcomes in strata defined by intervention strategy (prevention/treatment), AKI origin (cardio-renal syndrome, post-cardiopulmonary bypass, critical illness), control arm comparator (RRT, saline/placebo/standard of care) and its dose (< 160/≥ 160 mg) (p > 0.05 for all). Subjects who received furosemide with matched hydration in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) had a less frequent need for RRT (OR = 0.218; 95% CI 0.05–1.04; p = 0.055).ConclusionsFurosemide administration has neither an impact on mortality nor the requirement for RRT. Patients at risk of CIN may benefit from furosemide administration. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to verify these findings.