Abstract
How do stocks respond to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) regulatory interventions, and in what way do ESG reputations influence the magnitude of such responses? Through an event study approach, we investigate how establishing a mandate for "reasonable assurance" on ESG metrics affected market and firm-level returns in India. Findings reveal persistent negative post-event cumulative abnormal market returns declining to –1.20 % during the [+1,+5] window. The imposition of the reasonable assurance mandate depressed the market. However, consistent with a reservoir of goodwill hypothesis, ESG scores positively shielded firm-level investor reactions, with the governance component of ESG being the most influential.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
