Impact of enzyme inclusion on the digestibility of protein, amino acids, calcium and phosphorus in growing pigs depending on meal size, frequency and sampling period

Abstract

When digestibility trials are conducted, pigs are typically fed twice a day with a restricted amount of feed. These conditions are not representative of the feeding conditions in commercial farm. The present study aimed to determine the effects of meal size and frequency, xylanase and phytase inclusion as well as digesta sampling period, on the digestibility of protein, amino acids (AA), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P). Pigs (n = 6) were fitted with a T cannula, and each received all treatments following a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement in a 6 × 6 Latin square experimental design. The diets were supplemented or not with a combination of xylanase and phytase and divided into 3 feeding programs: one received 2 meals per day that met 3 times the maintenance energy requirement (2M), one received the same quantity of feed in 8 meals (8M), and another received an amount that supplied 5 times the maintenance energy requirements in 8 meals (8M+). Digesta was sampled from 0800 to 1200, 1200–1600, 1600–2000 and 0800–2000. The results indicated an improvement in the coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, P, Ca, Val and Thr with enzyme inclusion in all meal distribution (enzyme effect, P < 0.05). Apparent ileal digestibility of Ca in the 0800–1200 period was reduced in 8M+ treatment compared to 2M and 8M whereas no difference was observed for meal size or frequency in 1200–1600 and 1600–2000 periods (Interaction meal × period, P = 0.017). A meal effect was observed for coefficient of apparent total tract digestibility of Ca (meal effect, P = 0.003) which was higher by 8% in pigs fed 8M compared to 8M+ (contrast 8M vs 8M+, P = 0.040). Saturation of the absorption processes may explain lower digestibility with 8M+ . Enzyme efficacy was not affected by meal size or frequency indicating minor modifications of digestive conditions. An 8-h sampling period would allow collection of a representative sample and avoid underestimating or overestimating digestibility of certain nutrients.