Abstract

BackgroundWeb-based computer-tailored interventions have shown to be effective in improving health behavior; however, high dropout attrition is a major issue in these interventions.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess whether people with a lower educational level drop out from studies more frequently compared to people with a higher educational level and to what extent this depends on evaluation of these interventions.MethodsData from 7 randomized controlled trials of Web-based computer-tailored interventions were used to investigate dropout rates among participants with different educational levels. To be able to compare higher and lower educated participants, intervention evaluation was assessed by pooling data from these studies. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether intervention evaluation predicted dropout at follow-up measurements.ResultsIn 3 studies, we found a higher study dropout attrition rate among participants with a lower educational level, whereas in 2 studies we found that middle educated participants had a higher dropout attrition rate compared to highly educated participants. In 4 studies, no such significant difference was found. Three of 7 studies showed that participants with a lower or middle educational level evaluated the interventions significantly better than highly educated participants (“Alcohol-Everything within the Limit”: F 2,376=5.97, P=.003; “My Healthy Behavior”: F 2,359=5.52, P=.004; “Master Your Breath”: F 2,317=3.17, P=.04). One study found lower intervention evaluation by lower educated participants compared to participants with a middle educational level (“Weight in Balance”: F 2,37=3.17, P=.05). Low evaluation of the interventions was not a significant predictor of dropout at a later follow-up measurement in any of the studies.ConclusionsDropout attrition rates were higher among participants with a lower or middle educational level compared with highly educated participants. Although lower educated participants evaluated the interventions better in approximately half of the studies, evaluation did not predict dropout attrition. Further research is needed to find other explanations for high dropout rates among lower educated participants.

Highlights

  • Dropout attrition rates were higher among participants with a lower or middle educational level compared with highly educated participants

  • The aim of this study is first to examine if the dropout attrition rates in our 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Web-based computer-tailored interventions were higher for people with a lower educational level than people with a middle or high educational level

  • To examine differences in dropout attrition and evaluation between participants with different educational levels, we used a convenience sample of participants from 7 Web-based computer-tailored intervention studies that were conducted in the past years (2010-2014) at the Department of Health Promotion of Maastricht University in the Netherlands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous studies have demonstrated that Web-based computer-tailored interventions can be effective in motivating individuals to adopt different health behaviors [1,2,3], such as increasing physical activity [4,5,6,7,8,9,10], improving healthy nutrition [11,12,13,14], smoking cessation [15,16,17,18], and reducing alcohol intake [19,20,21], and they have been successfully applied to multiple health behaviors [22,23]. Low evaluation of the interventions was not a significant predictor of dropout at a later follow-up measurement in any of the studies

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call