Impact of early atrial arrhythmia recurrence on long-term CryoPVI success

Abstract

Abstract Background According to current guidelines, the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence within the first 90 days after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) should not indicate re-do procedures. Accordingly, a 90-day blanking period is usually accepted. However, data suggests that early atrial arrhythmia relapses during the blanking period have an impact on the efficacy. The optimal period for indicating a re-ablation therefore remains unclear. Methods We prospectively analyzed consecutive AF patients who underwent cryoballoon PVI (CryoPVI) in a single-center cohort between 2018 and 2023. We divided patients into four groups according to arrhythmia recurrence (recurrence between 0-30 days, recurrence between 30-60 days, recurrence between 60-90 days and no recurrence within the first 90 days). CryoPVI was performed in a standardized procedure. At 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after CryoPVI follow up was performed. Efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia relapse. Results During the study period 1179 patients underwent a first CryoPVI. Of these, 84 patients (7.1%) had atrial arrhythmia relapse between 0-30 days, 38 patients (3.2%) had atrial arrhythmia relapse between 30-60 days, and 38 patients (3.2%) had a relapse between 60-90 days. Overall, 1019 (86.4%) patients didn’t have an atrial arrhythmia relapse between 0-90 days after CryoPVI. Primary efficacy endpoint incidence after 36 months was significantly higher in patients who experienced atrial arrhythmia relapse within the first 90 days (between 0-30 days 62.5% vs. between 30-60 days 70.1% vs. between 60-90 days 77.9% vs. no recurrence ≤ 90 days 41.6%, p<0.0001). Conclusion Atrial arrhythmia relapse within the first 90 days is associated with a reduced long-term efficacy of CryoPVI. Re-ablation should be indicated regardless of the time of recurrence.