Impact of dynamic changes of tumor marker in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated triple-negative gastric cancer patients: a multi-center study

Abstract

BackgroundIndependent and valid prognostic predictors for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients with non-elevated serum tumor markers (Triple-negative: CA199 < 37U/ml, CEA < 5 µg/ml and CA125 < 35U/ml) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remain unclear.MethodsA total of 352 LAGC patients treated with NACT(NLAGC) from two centers were included. Of the 156 were Triple-negative patients. CA72-4 trajectory groupings was defined as longitudinal changes in CA72-4 levels before and after NACT to identify different potential subgroups and to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among subgroups. The predictive performance of the nomogram-trajectory was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC), decision curve analysis, and C-index.ResultsIn the Triple-negative patients, the Stable group had significantly worse 3-year OS than the Normal, Elevated, and Descend groups(3-year OS: 53.9% vs. 77.9% vs. 73.5% vs. 87.7%;P = 0.002). Cox multivariate analysis showed that CA72-4 trajectory groupings (Stable group: HR:3.442, 95%CI[1.574–7.528], P = 0.002) was an independent prognostic risk factor. In addition, the C-index and AUC values based on the nomogram-trajectory were significantly higher than those of ypTNM staging (C-index: 0.788 vs. 0.719,P < 0.001;AUC: 0.800 vs. 0.667,P < 0.001). Furthermore, The survival analysis revealed that the 3-year OS of the Low-Risk group of nomogram scores was significantly better than that of the High-Risk group(3-year OS:84.7% vs. 29.1%). And the Low-Risk group had the lower cumulative risk of recurrence (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe CA72-4 trajectory groupings were an independent prognostic factor for NLAGC Triple-negative patients. The predictive efficacy of the Nomogram-trajectory was significantly better than the ypTNM.