Impact of dual procedures: How combining VP shunt placement for hydrocephalus and myelomeningocele repair in newborns affects complication rates?

Abstract

To discern the efficacy of simultaneous versus delayed VPS surgery in managing hydrocephalus linked with MMC repair: The debate over the concurrent or deferred placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) during myelomeningocele (MMC) repair in hydrocephalic neonates necessitates a nuanced evaluation of associated risks and benefits. While VPS placement can mitigate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and minimize wound dehiscence post-MMC repair, it concurrently introduces potential hazards such as infections and shunt-related malfunctions. This prospective cohort study focused on144 newborns with spinal myelomeningocele and hydrocephalus. Divided into two groups based on the timing of dysraphism repair and VPS placement, 101 children underwent concurrent procedures, while 43 received deferred VPS insertion post-MMC closure. Female patients constituted 60% of the cohort, with lumbar lesions being predominant. The median age for MMC closure was three days. Analysis revealed that the deferred insertion group exhibited higher rates of shunt malfunctions, CSF leaks, and wound dehiscence compared to the concurrent insertion group. Although indications hinted at a potential increase in shunt infections in the immediate insertion group, statistical significance was lacking. The study established a statistically significant association between the timing of shunt insertion during MMC repair and specific outcomes, such as CSF leaks and wound dehiscence. The findings suggest that concurrent shunt insertion during MMC repair may reduce the incidence of these complications compared to deferred insertion. However, no substantial differences emerged in terms of shunt infection and malfunction, emphasizing the persistent challenges associated with these major complications.