Abstract

BackgroundAnonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions—ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous—on survey response and on respondents’ representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes.MethodsA 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data.ResultsResponse rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents’ characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007).ConclusionGreater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants’ “honesty” or “accuracy” than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research.

Highlights

  • Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods

  • While the lowest response rate was obtained from men randomized to the Confidential/$10 incentive group, tests for interactions between tracking/privacy and incentives on response rate were not statistically significant (p = 0.46)

  • Veterans randomized to the Anonymous-Postcard were less likely to have made a Veterans Affairs (VA) health care visit of any kind in the past year than were veterans randomized to the Anonymized-Envelope and Confidential groups (67.6% versus 75.4% in the other two conditions)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Surveys represent one of the most efficient and inexpensive research methods available to collect representative, high quality data from large numbers of research participants They frequently serve as the backbone used to define the scope and magnitude of many potential public health problems. Studies suggest that disclosure of sensitive information on self-administered questionnaires is enhanced yet more when participants respond anonymously instead of confidentially [5,8,9,10,11] This implies that anonymous, self-administered surveys may be the optimal method for accurately cataloging information about certain public health problems, such as the prevalence of physical or sexual abuse or of mental health symptoms

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.