Impact of different energy sources on coagulation biomarkers and silent cerebral events in balloon-based ablation for atrial fibrillation

Abstract

BackgroundDifferent energy sources of balloon-based ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) cause different kinds of endothelial damage and coagulation responses associated with thromboembolic risk. ObjectivesTo compare the impact of different balloon-based ablation, cryo-balloon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA), on coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers and silent cerebral events (SCEs) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). MethodsPAF patients who underwent PVI using either CBA (n=52) or LBA (n=53) without radiofrequency touch-up ablation were eligible. Time-course (day-0 [before ablation], day-1, day-2, and day-28) of myocardial enzymes and inflammatory and coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers was evaluated during the perioperative period. Brain MRI was performed within 2 days after the procedure to evaluate SCEs. ResultsThere was no difference in patient characteristics between CBA and LBA.CBA had greater myocardial injury (troponin-I and creatine kinase MB) and lower inflammatory reaction (WBC and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) than LBA. The coagulation biomarkers maximally increased by day-2 and then decreased in both groups. In day-28, the serum prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimer levels in LBA were significantly higher than the values in CBA. The fibrinolysis biomarker (plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex) did not increase after the procedure in either group. The incidence of SCEs was comparable between CBA and LBA (11% vs. 15%, p=0.591). No thromboembolic event was observed. ConclusionCBA and LBA had different effects on myocardial injury, inflammatory reaction, and coagulation activity but did not affect the incidence of thromboembolic events. LBA had significantly higher coagulation activity in day-28 and may require more careful post-procedural anticoagulation than CBA.