Impact of Different Double-Moment Microphysical Schemes on Simulations of a Bow-Shaped Squall Line in East China

Abstract

Four typical double-moment cloud microphysical schemes (Milbrandt, Morrison, NSSL and WDM6) in WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting) are used to investigate the impact of the different schemes on the simulation of a straight squall line evolving into a bow-shaped one in East China on 15 April 2016. Although simulations with Milbrandt, Morrison and WDM6 schemes can produce bow-shaped squall lines, only the WDM6 scheme can simulate the evolution process of the straight squall line to a bow-shaped one well. The simulation results with the NSSL scheme produce a broken straight squall line. The possible reason is that the range and intensity of cold pools and the rear inflows are different among the four schemes when the observed squall line evolves into a standard bow-shaped squall line. The mixing ratio and number concentration of rain water with the WDM6 scheme is largest in strong convective areas, and the cold pool and rear inflow are also strongest among the four schemes. Compared with the WDM6 scheme, the mixing ratio and number concentration of rain water are less with the Milbrandt and Morrison schemes. Also, the cold pool and rear inflow with the Milbrandt scheme are weaker than for the WDM6 scheme but stronger than those with the Morrison scheme. The rainwater mixing ratio is very low and no obvious cold pool and rear inflow exist with the NSSL scheme.