Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units (MUs), reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a megavoltage cone‐beam computed tomography (MV‐CBCT) system in image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in head‐and‐neck patients. The MV‐CBCT system was a Siemens MVision, a commercial system integrated into the Siemens ONCOR linear accelerator. The positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system was determined using an anthropomorphic phantom while varying the MV‐CBCT imaging MU, reconstruction slice thickness, and planning CT slice thickness. A total of 240 CBCT images from six head‐and‐neck patients who underwent intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment were acquired and reconstructed using different MV‐CBCT scanning protocols. The interfractional setup errors of the patients were retrospectively analyzed for different imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. Using the anthropomorphic phantom, the largest measured mean deviation component and standard deviation of the MVision in 3D directions were 1.3 and 1.0 mm, respectively, for different CBCT imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. The largest setup group system error (M), system error (∑), and random error (σ) from six head‐and‐neck patients were 0.6, 1.2, and 1.7 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found in the positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system between the 5 and 8 MUs, and between the 1 and 3 mm reconstruction slice thicknesses. A thin planning CT slice thickness may achieve higher positioning precision using the phantom measurement, but no significant difference was found in clinical setup precision between the 1 and 3 mm planning CT slice thicknesses.PACS number: 87.55 ne
Highlights
Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have been widely used in the treatment of cancer
Positioning accuracy of the megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography (MV-CBCT) system for the phantom Table 1 shows the measured positioning deviation of the MV-CBCT system between the treatment center and planning treatment isocenter using the phantom at known positions in 3D directions for the different CBCT imaging monitor units (MUs), reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses
The results indicated no significant differences in the positioning accuracy between the 5 and 8 imaging MUs and between the 1 and 3 mm CBCT reconstruction slice thicknesses (p > 0.05)
Summary
Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have been widely used in the treatment of cancer. These techniques require greater precision in treatment setup and delivery than conventional techniques if the dose delivered to the target area must be assured. In-room 3D imaging systems for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) have been widely used in radiation oncology as the tool of choice for patient setup verification.[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] The greatest advantages sought from the development of these new technologies over previous two-dimensional (2D) imaging approaches are an increased positioning accuracy using volumetric information, and the possibility of observing bony anatomy and specific soft-tissue structures to assess patient setup and anatomical changes that occur during the course of therapy.[15,16,17]. The benefits of MV-CBCT imaging are substantial and improve radiation treatment accuracy
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
