Impact of debates on student perceptions and competency scores in the advanced pharmacy practice setting

Abstract

Background and purposeAdvanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) students are faced with the difficult reality that there is rarely one correct answer to a patient care question. Faculty preceptors developed a clinical debate activity to provide students with an opportunity to explore pharmacy topics with competing viewpoints. Educational activity and settingThe clinical debate activity was implemented in the APPE setting as a collaboration between three faculty preceptors from Drake University and University of Iowa. Student pre-debate and post-debate survey data was collected to assess the perceived impact of clinical debates on student confidence in skills related to the debate. Students were also asked to provide which skills were developed through the debate, whether participation in the debate changed their opinion on the issue, and if debates should be used as a teaching tool. Faculty preceptor scores on midpoint and final evaluations for applicable APPE competencies were also evaluated. FindingsForty-two students participated in a clinical debate over a 12-month period. Students demonstrated improved confidence in almost all areas assessed, and 90.5% of students felt debates should be used as a teaching tool. Assessment of faculty midpoint (pre-debate) and final (post-debate) evaluation scores revealed statistically significant improvements in competencies related to literature evaluation and communication skills. Discussion and conclusionsClinical debates have had a positive impact on both subjective and objective results in this APPE setting. Preceptors are encouraged to consider implementing a similar activity. Debates are a useful teaching tool in developing confidence and skills.